|
Stacy,
Any payer who requires the Type Of Service is not in
compliance. After 16 October, it seems that the only remedy is complaining
to CMS.
Since you want to be paid, I would suggest that you populate
the field only for those payers who "need" it, document why you are sending a
non-complient claim, and send the documentation to CMS (and arrange for any
clearinghouses along the way to pass through the TOS without
comment). You could also automatically generate a complaint each time you
have to use the TOS, but this might be excessive (if you overwhelm CMS with
complaints, they may surrender, and only enforce extreme cases).
The reason the TOS was eliminated is that it is
redundant. If procedure codes are properly used, each procedure code maps
to one and only one TOS. If Surgical codes have been mis-used as
Anasthesia codes, then the TOS could come into play to separate the Surgery from
the Anasthesia. In that case, you have 2 issues -- use of the TOS and
mis-use of the Procedure Code. Illinois Medicaid throws another curve --
they want each TOS on a separate claim (this is not usually a problem for me,
since most of the procedures we bill for have the same TOS).
The opinions expressed here are my own and not necessarily the opinion of
LCMH.
Douglas M. Webb
Computer System Engineer Little Company of Mary Hospital & Health Care Centers [EMAIL PROTECTED] "This electronic message may contain information that is confidential
and/or legally privileged. It is intended only for the use of the individual(s)
and entity(s) named as recipients in the message. If you are not an
intended recipient of the message, please notify the sender immediately,
delete the material from any computer, do not deliver, distribute, or copy this
message, and do not disclose its contents or take action in reliance on the
information it contains. Thank you."
--- The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated. The discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual participants, and do not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board of Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If you wish to receive an official opinion, post your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues Database at http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/. These listservs should not be used for commercial marketing purposes or discussion of specific vendor products and services. They also are not intended to be used as a forum for personal disagreements or unprofessional communication at any time. You are currently subscribed to wedi-transactions as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this list, go to the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at http://subscribe.wedi.org or send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you need to unsubscribe but your current email address is not the same as the address subscribed to the list, please use the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at http://subscribe.wedi.org |
Title: Message
- Type of Service still needed? Stacy Trease
- RE: Type of Service still needed? Kerry Zajicek
- RE: Type of Service still needed? Tiffany Gutraj Rosik
- RE: Type of Service still needed? Kerry Zajicek
- Re: Type of Service still needed? Doug Webb
- Re: Type of Service still needed? Doug Webb
- RE: Type of Service still needed? Koller, Greg
- Re: Type of Service still needed? Doug Webb
- RE: Type of Service still needed? Koller, Greg
- RE: Type of Service still needed? Stacy Trease
- RE: Type of Service still needed? Young, Brian
- RE: Type of Service still needed? Tom Berthoff
- Re: Type of Service still needed? Doug Webb
- Re: Type of Service still needed? Cathy Sheppard
