|
I have
been asked to add this information to lots of areas - all of which I am
extremely leery of implementing past 10/16/03.
One of the proposed "fixes" for this issue was to request of us to
send the TOS in a REF segment in the 2400 loop which the
payer has interpreted as "able to be used at their discretion" -
although the qualifier would really not apply to the information in the segment,
so I'm not sure that's a good idea.
It has also been requested of us to send this info as a line note in the 2400 loop, but that concerns me because it would override any possibility of a true line note. Another request was asking us to send it in the line item control number REF segment in the 2400 loop, but that's not an option either in my opinion because payers are required to return this number in the remittance advice transaction (835) if the providers sends it to them in the 837. Most commonly, we are being asked to send the TOS in SV106. Is there really any way for payers to be able to get around rewriting their adjudication systems if they are currently dependent on type of service? Stacy M. Trease
------------ Gateway EDI, Inc. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended addressee, or the person responsible for delivering it to them, you may not copy, forward, disclose or otherwise use it or any part of it in any way. To do so may be unlawful. If you receive this email by mistake, please advise the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the original message. --- The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated. The discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual participants, and do not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board of Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If you wish to receive an official opinion, post your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues Database at http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/. These listservs should not be used for commercial marketing purposes or discussion of specific vendor products and services. They also are not intended to be used as a forum for personal disagreements or unprofessional communication at any time. You are currently subscribed to wedi-transactions as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this list, go to the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at http://subscribe.wedi.org or send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you need to unsubscribe but your current email address is not the same as the address subscribed to the list, please use the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at http://subscribe.wedi.org |
Title: Message
- Type of Service still needed? Stacy Trease
- RE: Type of Service still needed? Kerry Zajicek
- RE: Type of Service still needed? Tiffany Gutraj Rosik
- RE: Type of Service still needed? Kerry Zajicek
- Re: Type of Service still needed? Doug Webb
- Re: Type of Service still needed? Doug Webb
- RE: Type of Service still needed? Koller, Greg
- Re: Type of Service still needed? Doug Webb
- RE: Type of Service still needed? Koller, Greg
- RE: Type of Service still needed? Stacy Trease
- RE: Type of Service still needed? Young, Brian
- RE: Type of Service still needed? Tom Berthoff
- Re: Type of Service still needed? Doug Webb
- Re: Type of Service still needed? Cathy Sheppard
