Hey Matthew, your GitHub link 404s. Do you have an updated link for it? 

My model, the 1400, does not use the console (by console I'm assuming you 
mean the screen?) to upload data. My only way to intercept the data is 
either by screen scraping, or redirection. As mentioned, screen scraping 
the Observer is not ideal and caused more problems than it's worth. Using 
the redirection has been working great, not only for weewx, but other 
archival methods since the data is freely available on the socket. 

In any case, I strongly recommend you do not advertise the scraping method. 
It is known to cause issues with the ObserverIP unit. The ObserverIP (black 
box with antenna on it) is an inexpensive unit that can barely survive an 
uptime of 30 days, let alone screen scraping every 15 seconds. 

Understood on the ease of use. My method is not necessarily easy, however 
my blog posts outlines step by step on how to get started (across 2 
different methods) which have helped a few other users. Again, I wasn't 
going to consider submission, but was nudged to do so today. 

Pat


On Monday, January 30, 2017 at 9:34:56 AM UTC-5, mwall wrote:
>
> pat,
>
> please take a look at this weewx wiki page:
>
> https://github.com/weewx/weewx/wiki/observer
>
> the interceptor approach is pretty much the only option for the fine 
> offset bridges, but there is a direct-connect approach for the fine offset 
> wifi consoles that requires zero configuration (no scraping or capture or 
> php or listen or sniff is necessary).  i started a driver for this approach 
> (https://github.com/matthewwall/observer), but susan actually has a 
> working implementation:
>
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/weewx-development/rzLBh9g-pIU
>
> its nice that there are a lot of options for getting data from this 
> hardware, but it would be nice to consolidate into a driver that we can 
> include in the weewx distribution.
>
> given the popularity of the fine offset stations, and since direct-connect 
> requires zero configuration, i think it is a no-brainer to put a 
> direct-connect driver in weewx.
>
> however, including a driver that uses the interception approach is not so 
> obvious - either sniff or listen requires not-insignificant 
> network/hardware/software configuration.
>
> tom can provide some guidelines about what should or should not be part of 
> the weewx distribution...
>
> m
>

Reply via email to