Ok, after hours of trial and error I guess the lable 'aggregate_interval' 
is responsible for my issue.
I set it to 60 (so Images/Plots will get copied when older than a minute 
everytime a record runs).

Sorry for the spam.

But can you answer me the question if there are limitations regarding the 
color formatting in the skin.conf?
E.g. I can not set  the color '0xD17729' in the ImageGenerator Section for 
the label 'axis_label_font_color'. E.g. 'white' or 'yellow' works great.
When I try for example 'axis_label_font_color = 0xD17729' the axis label 
font color just appears as blue.
So are there limits what color codes I can use?
Any thoughts?

Thank you, Henry.

On Thursday, February 21, 2019 at 7:03:04 PM UTC+1, Henry Denston wrote:
>
> Thank you very much Tom.
>
> One thing I can not figure out is: 
>
> In the docs it says that everytime an archive period is over (every time a 
> new record is done) all the newly generated images (plots) get copied into 
> the public_html folder.
> What I noticed for me is that this is not the case. (actually it seems to 
> be a lot longer until they are updated).
> When triggering a report manually using the wee_reports command the same 
> behavior can be observed.
> However, when I delete the .png images (plots) from the public_html folder 
> the fresh images get copied into the public_html right away when the next 
> record is done.
> Can you tell me how to change this so the newest plot images are always 
> copied to the public_html folder everytime a new record is done?
> I tried to set copy_always flag in the skin.conf in the copy_generator 
> section but no change.
> Also cannot seem to find anything in the docs that can help me.
>
> Thank you very much, Henry.
>
> I have no stale_age or cronjob defined for report generation.
>
> On Wednesday, February 20, 2019 at 2:56:36 PM UTC+1, Tom Keffer wrote:
>>
>> When a new record arrives, WeeWX tries to write all the types it can into 
>> the database. If a type is not in the database schema, it is skipped. 
>>
>> If you're interested, the logic is in function manager._addSingleRecord() 
>> <https://github.com/weewx/weewx/blob/master/bin/weewx/manager.py#L273>.
>>
>> -tk
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 11:02 PM Henry Denston <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Tom, in case I would like to create my own database schema, is it enough 
>>> to just remove the cloumns from the dictionary in this file: 
>>> .\weewx\bin\schemas\wview.py'' ?
>>> Seems like weewx still tries to write to removed database columns when 
>>> trying to save a record.
>>>
>>> Would really appreciate it in case you could name at least some files 
>>> off the cuff that I have to look into.
>>> Thanks :)
>>>
>>> On Friday, February 15, 2019 at 11:23:00 PM UTC+1, Tom Keffer wrote:
>>>>
>>>> If you're going to all the trouble of creating a custom database 
>>>> schema, you can certainly make additional changes to suit your needs. Just 
>>>> be careful not to drop something you'll need for your reports.
>>>>
>>>> However, you'll find removing unused observation types does not save as 
>>>> much space as you think. A major part of the database is the index, which 
>>>> will still be there.
>>>>
>>>> As far as what's the best practice? I'd say, do what Google does: save 
>>>> everything. Storage is cheap.
>>>>
>>>> -tk
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 11:50 AM Henry Denston <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Tom,
>>>>>
>>>>> thank you very much for your great reply! :)
>>>>> I do not have an existing database yet.
>>>>>
>>>>> I already read the  *Adding a new type to the database 
>>>>> <http://weewx.com/docs/customizing.htm#add_archive_type> *section in 
>>>>> the Customizing Guide, however was confused as I thought this only 
>>>>> applies 
>>>>> in case one wants to add a new observation type that is not present in 
>>>>> weewx yet (as in the example electricity).
>>>>> I wanted to add additional radiation sources (and there is already the 
>>>>> radiation observation type implemented in weewx), so I thought by using 
>>>>> an 
>>>>> already existing observation type I might not need to adjust the database 
>>>>> structure.
>>>>> Your answer however, clearly shows how to make the required changes, 
>>>>> thank you very much! (Maybe add this little example to the docs, right 
>>>>> next 
>>>>> to the electricity eample? :))
>>>>>
>>>>> *Another question:*
>>>>> By using the file user/extensions.py additional sensors can be added 
>>>>> to weewx as you have presented.
>>>>> Is it best practice to just append additionally required sensors to 
>>>>> the standard weewx database structure or should I (make some additional 
>>>>> changes to) 'rebuild' the used database structure for my system?
>>>>> For example in case I intend to use only about 8 sensors/values in my 
>>>>> current system (e.g.: dateTime, usUnits, windSpeed, outTemp, radiation, 
>>>>> radiation1, radiation2, radiation3) I could remove all additional values 
>>>>> in 
>>>>> the database that I will not use (e.g. barometer, pressure, altimeter, 
>>>>> inTemp, etc....) ? Would love to hear your opinion on that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you very much, Henry.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Friday, February 15, 2019 at 7:51:13 PM UTC+1, Tom Keffer wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, your strategy would work, and your names (radiation1, radiation2, 
>>>>>> and radiation3) are sensible names to give the extra sensors.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You would have to change the database schema to accommodate the extra 
>>>>>> sensors. 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you have an existing database, to which you want to add the new 
>>>>>> observation types? If so, then follow the instructions in the 
>>>>>> Customizing 
>>>>>> Guide, section *Adding a new type to the database 
>>>>>> <http://weewx.com/docs/customizing.htm#add_archive_type>*. If there 
>>>>>> is something that is confusing about the instructions, let us know what 
>>>>>> the 
>>>>>> problem is so we can clarify and, perhaps, update the documents and make 
>>>>>> it 
>>>>>> clearer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you do not have an existing database, then it is slightly easier. 
>>>>>> To the bottom of the file user/extensions.py, add the following: 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> import schemas.wview
>>>>>> radiation_schema = schemas.wview.schema + [
>>>>>>     ('radiation1'', 'REAL'),
>>>>>>     ('radiation2'', 'REAL'),
>>>>>>     ('radiation3'', 'REAL'),
>>>>>> ]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then go into your weewx.conf and change the [DataBindings] and 
>>>>>> [Databases] section so they look like this:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [DataBindings]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     [[wx_binding]]
>>>>>>         # The database must match one of the sections in [Databases].
>>>>>>         # This is likely to be the only option you would want to change.
>>>>>>         database = archive_sqlite
>>>>>>         # The name of the table within the database
>>>>>>         table_name = archive
>>>>>>         # The manager handles aggregation of data for historical 
>>>>>> summaries
>>>>>>         manager = weewx.wxmanager.WXDaySummaryManager
>>>>>>         # The schema defines the structure of the database.
>>>>>>         # It is *only* used when the database is created.
>>>>>>         schema = user.extensions.radiation_schema
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ##############################################################################
>>>>>>
>>>>>> #   This section defines various databases.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [Databases]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     # A SQLite database is simply a single file
>>>>>>     [[archive_sqlite]]
>>>>>>         database_name = radiation.sdb
>>>>>>         database_type = SQLite
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     # MySQL
>>>>>>     [[archive_mysql]]
>>>>>>         database_name = weewx
>>>>>>         database_type = MySQL
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Restart WeeWX.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WeeWX will now use the new database radiation.sdb, which will have 
>>>>>> the new SQL columns.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -tk
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 8:51 AM Henry Denston <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello everyone!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm currently developing a custom weather station (a microcontroller 
>>>>>>> collecting data from custom sensors and forwarding it to a RaspberryPi).
>>>>>>> I already read the customization guide multiple times and started to 
>>>>>>> develop a custom weewx-driver for my custom weather station.
>>>>>>> The customization guide offers some very valuable insights. However, 
>>>>>>> I still have some questions and misunderstandings I guess, so I hope 
>>>>>>> some 
>>>>>>> experienced users/developers can help me out. :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As already stated I started developing my own driver, I also edited 
>>>>>>> the weewx.conf and my custom driver is loaded when I start weewx with: 
>>>>>>> sudo 
>>>>>>> ./bin/weewxd weewx.conf (it yields/prints packets)
>>>>>>> I checked the sql table structures in the documentation and now I'm 
>>>>>>> not sure how to save my custom sensors values.
>>>>>>> For example: I have a windsensor (measuring windspeed only), a 
>>>>>>> temperature sensor and 4 pyranometer sensors of different kind 
>>>>>>> measuring 
>>>>>>> the sun irradiation.
>>>>>>> Now in my custon driver I know that I can store/assign the windspeed 
>>>>>>> and temperature like this for example:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> data = dict()
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> data['dateTime'] = int(data_array[0])  # unix timestamp
>>>>>>> data['usUnits'] = weewx.METRIC
>>>>>>> data['windSpeed'] = float(data_array[1])  # Anemometer measuring 
>>>>>>> windspeed only
>>>>>>> data['outTemp'] = float(data_array[0])  # PT100 measuring temperature 
>>>>>>> outside
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> yield data  
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So this should be straight forward if I understand correctly.
>>>>>>> But how do I store my irradiation values from the various 
>>>>>>> pyranomerters?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It seems that in the expected database structure there is only one 
>>>>>>> column for irradiation available.
>>>>>>> How can I store it so WeeWx can use it in its reports and archives?
>>>>>>> I have smth. like this in mind:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> data['radiation'] = float(dataset_array_sensor[2])  # pyranometer 1
>>>>>>> data['radiation1'] = float(dataset_array_sensor[3])  # pyranometer 2
>>>>>>> data['radiation2'] = float(dataset_array_sensor[4])  # pyranometer 3
>>>>>>> data['radiation3'] = float(dataset_array_sensor[5])  # pyranometer 4
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Would this work?
>>>>>>> Do I have to change the sql database structure for it to work? (I 
>>>>>>> plan to use sqlite for it as its easier to use it out of the box)
>>>>>>> If so, how would I do it?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I did read the customization guide multiple times but I'm really 
>>>>>>> confused regarding this.
>>>>>>> I hope you can give me a hint into the right direction (I think I'm 
>>>>>>> probably way overthinking this and just missing a small detail)
>>>>>>> Thank you very much in advance! :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best regards, Henry.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>

Reply via email to