Ok gracias... por el precio si es mejor la Davis iría a por esa... a ver si busco financiación :)
Una pregunta... tú tienes la Davis Vantage ?, el sensor de temperatura está bien protegido y da valores correctos aunque la estación esté expuesta al Sur y sin sombra? Otra pregunta... sabes si este precio es bueno? (https://www.amazon.es/DAVIS-VANTAGE-WIRELESS-WEATHER-STATION/dp/B002LLVFK0/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1493978340&sr=8-2&keywords=davis+vantage+vue) , y con lo que trae se puede conectar a PC (Raspberry) o hay que comprar a parte un datalogger?.. Qué opinas de esto: https://www.amazon.es/dp/B01AHGOG8S/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pC_nS_ttl?_encoding=UTF8&colid=1ZG9F5T2D63PS&coliid=I3OQQVOL9PR1HK ? Saludos y gracias por la info y el interés. El viernes, 5 de mayo de 2017, 10:57:21 (UTC+2), Ruben Navarro Huedo escribió: > > A malas la Oregon WMR-300. > Lo malo es que Oregon es Oregon. El soporte es nulo completamente. > > > El jueves, 4 de mayo de 2017, 22:04:55 (UTC+2), Juan Antonio Mosquera > escribió: >> >> Gracias por la respuesta, apunto esa, aunque se me va de presupuesto, >> pero la pongo de primera por ahora.. >> >> Saludos! >> >> El jueves, 4 de mayo de 2017, 20:44:02 (UTC+2), Ruben Navarro Huedo >> escribió: >>> >>> Buenas tardes Juan Antonio. >>> >>> Si puedes compra una Davis Vantage Vue. >>> Soportada por weewx y con mas que sobrada fiablidad y precision. >>> >>> >>> El jueves, 4 de mayo de 2017, 16:39:14 (UTC+2), Juan Antonio Mosquera >>> escribió: >>>> >>>> I want a better season than the Watson W-8681. Have better sun >>>> protection for correct temperature and precipitation. >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>> El jueves, 4 de mayo de 2017, 16:20:13 (UTC+2), gjr80 escribió: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Wow, that is very general question. I suspect if you ask 10 different >>>>> people you will get (at least) 10 different answers. You could probably >>>>> start off looking at the Driver status >>>>> <http://weewx.com/docs/hardware.htm#driver_status> table at the start >>>>> of the weeWX Hardware Guide <http://weewx.com/docs/hardware.htm>. In >>>>> particular you may find the 'Maturity' column helpful, just be aware that >>>>> one person's 'Tested' is another person's 'Experimental'. The rest of the >>>>> Hardware Guide may provide you with some valuable insight. The weeWX >>>>> Hardware >>>>> page <http://weewx.com/hardware.html> may also be of help. >>>>> >>>>> I suspect your budget and the features you require of the >>>>> station/weeWX will determine what stations are suitable. Perhaps once you >>>>> have given these aspects more thought you might get some more specific >>>>> advice. >>>>> >>>>> Gary >>>>> >>>>> On Wednesday, 3 May 2017 19:55:37 UTC+10, Juan Antonio Mosquera wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I am thinking of improving the weather station I currently use ( >>>>>> https://www.astroradio.com/514020.html >>>>>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.astroradio.com%2F514020.html&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNEy4glXi4Qjs0zwJUjBvxmeVZ0n0g> >>>>>> ). >>>>>> >>>>>> Which station do I recommend compatible with weewx? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> >>>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weewx-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
