> If you get yours back in operation, kindly let me know how the temp readings fair.
Will do. On Friday, March 15, 2019 at 8:14:39 AM UTC-5, G Hammer wrote: > > I like the idea and the maker seems to be a high quality operation. > I'm just concerned about the lack of a radiation shield. > If you get yours back in operation, kindly let me know how the temp > readings fair. > Should they be accurate, I'd certainly get one. > > On Thursday, March 14, 2019 at 9:15:35 PM UTC-4, Andrew B wrote: >> >> That's actually why I purchased a WS10. I had a weatherflow station that >> I sent back due to inconsistent readings. >> >> I'm in the middle of a move but I ran the WS10 for a few days when it >> arrived and it did perform better than the weatherflow. I'm hoping to get >> it setup again within the next month and see how it does over a longer >> period. >> >> So far I've only been able to find one of these reporting to Wunderground: >> >> https://www.wunderground.com/personal-weather-station/dashboard?ID=IPURMERE71 >> >> On Wednesday, March 13, 2019 at 10:48:51 PM UTC-5, Andrew B wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Can anyone tell me if WeeWx supports the Lufft WS10 station? >>> >>> It's a newer station from lufft that makes its data available over the >>> wifi network it connects to: >>> >>> https://www.lufft.com/products/compact-weather-sensors-293/lufft-ws10-smart-weather-sensor-2421/ >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weewx-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
