*Thanks good to know. I extended my schema ~5 yrs ago, to add some lake 
height and wave height measured by a MaxBotix rangefinder, and lightning, 
parameters. A couple other params I stuffed into unused columns in the 
weewx.sdb and renamed the reports. *

*I'm going to have to rebuild my whole server next time I'm home because I 
think the system took a power hit, my cameras show a bright flash last 
month and stuff started malfunctioning. *

*I'm not energetic enough to build my own I2C owfs interace; as for mine I 
use Sheepwalk Electronics' RPI hat. *
*My whole system is on an isolated (or so I thought), 12V --> 5V / 3.3V 
power supply based on a standard fire/burg system standby power supply. My 
system was up for over 400 days until I started having weird problems, and 
I had to reboot it. Still having problems which are logically inconsistent 
-- weewx ftp (to my web hosting service) often fails and is very slow, 
however -- the logically inconsistent part -- speedtest-cli shows good 
up/down speeds, and ftp from another server at the local network to the 
hosting service is very fast, so it seems something in the weewx ftp 
utility is affected and I'm suspecting it's damaged. I had to rebuild this 
pi a few years ago due to a zap which, i believe, came through the router 
in the boathouse (it's in a boathouse).*
*So that's my main system. I'm temporarily stationed in Germany for another 
couple years but like to know the conditions & status of stuff back home 
(on the Tennessee river, Alabama)*

*"mp"*

On Tuesday, May 26, 2020 at 12:25:54 PM UTC+2, Gazza wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, May 26, 2020 at 6:18:17 PM UTC+10, Messy Potamia wrote:
>>
>>
>> *I'm following this because one of my weewx stations rely heavily on OW 
>> sensors to augment the data from my Davis Vantage pro2. *
>> *I'd upgrade to weewx 4.x but really can't lose owfs operability*.
>> Thx/mp
>>
>
> This testing has been with a fresh install of Buster on a Pi4 and OWFS 
> seems to be working fine with Weewx V4 and python2 using the wview-extended 
> schema. I specifically wanted to use the extended schema so I could use the 
> additional extraTemp and extraHumid fields (currently using extraTemp1-5 
> and extraHumid1-4). 
>
> I have tested the V3 database to V4 conversion and it worked but I don't 
> think that is much use as some of my sensors will now use different 
> database fields.
>
>
> Gaz
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"weewx-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/557c97cf-fdc3-4bf9-9b34-7ed6d7f478a8%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to