Sounds like our analysis was spot on. At least you know what the problem is
now!

On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 2:55 PM kiwigander <[email protected]> wrote:

> Progress report:
> I've got a Unitek BF-810Y USB<=>RS232 converter.  Plugged it in to the old
> Dell; it was recognised as a pl2303 converter on ttyUSB0. Changed the
> relevant line in weewx.conf, restarted the daemon and we're in business.
> I'll have a last go at the RS232 ports on the XCY mini PC but I'm not
> optimistic about that unit.
>
> On Saturday, November 28, 2020 at 1:23:28 PM UTC+13 kiwigander wrote:
>
>> Thanks again for the advice and suggestions.
>>
>> I've used *stty* to see how the ever-reliable RS232 port is configured
>> on the old server and will try setting the new one to mimic it.
>>
>> I'll try purging modemmanager from the new server.
>>
>> Assuming, though, that the problem is defective hardware, the new server
>> ought to be returnable but I'd have to send it back to the PRC.  I wonder
>> whether the serial comms module is replaceable -- that might be more
>> cost-effective than sending the unit back.  I'll try a USB<=>RS232
>> converter anyway.
>>
>> I'll be offline for a couple of weeks but will report back.
>>
>> On Saturday, November 28, 2020 at 3:02:00 AM UTC+13 [email protected]
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Good point. I've had problems with modemmanager doing this.
>>>
>>>
>>> *sudo apt purge modemmanager*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 5:57 AM Cameron D <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Have you checked that there is not any form of getty running on the
>>>> port - they wait for logins and will steal some of the input characters.
>>>>
>>>> That's rather old school - I don't know how systemd does it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Friday, 27 November 2020 at 11:00:27 pm UTC+10 [email protected]
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I think we can say with some confidence that there is something wrong
>>>>> with the UART chip on your new computer. Can you take it back?
>>>>>
>>>>> Alternatively, as Vince says, a serial-to-usb converter. They seem to
>>>>> be more reliable these days.
>>>>>
>>>>> -tk
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 8:47 PM kiwigander <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ta.  The prevalent RS232<=>USB chipset around these parts seems to be
>>>>>> an FTDI.  I'll look around.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Friday, November 27, 2020 at 4:19:32 PM UTC+13 vince wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I was hoping to avoid USB<=>RS232 converters, as I understood they
>>>>>>>> were problematic (in the past) and would add another 
>>>>>>>> thing-to-go-wrong.  I
>>>>>>>> have one other old device to monitor and it too has only an RS232
>>>>>>>> interface.  Thought I'd be clever and get a low power box with two 
>>>>>>>> RS232
>>>>>>>> ports.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> FWIW, i've been running a VP2 with serial datalogger and a
>>>>>>> serial2usb dongle for something like 10 years now.   I started with a
>>>>>>> Shuttle mini-pc that had serial ports and switched to a little arm box 
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>> just has USB.  Never had an issue with the serial2usb from day one.  
>>>>>>> Works
>>>>>>> great.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You basically just want to make sure you get the right chipset in
>>>>>>> the adaptor.  Anything with the PL2303 definitely works.  Both mine have
>>>>>>> that chipset, and they were picked up years apart from different 
>>>>>>> suppliers,
>>>>>>> so they used to be pretty much what you always got.  I haven't looked in
>>>>>>> years to know if that's still the case.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm running on a Seagate Dockstar (a 128MB RAM version of the
>>>>>>> original PogoPlug) with a Seagate laptop drive plugged in, and you can 
>>>>>>> see
>>>>>>> the serial adaptor available in the lsusb output below.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> root@debian:~# lsusb
>>>>>>> Bus 001 Device 002: ID 05e3:0608 Genesys Logic, Inc. USB-2.0 4-Port
>>>>>>> HUB
>>>>>>> Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
>>>>>>> Bus 001 Device 003: ID 0bc2:2120 Seagate RSS LLC
>>>>>>> Bus 001 Device 004: ID 067b:2303 Prolific Technology, Inc. PL2303
>>>>>>> Serial Port
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>> Groups "weewx-user" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/d7e49691-043f-4f6c-a998-dd91c3eaa34an%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/d7e49691-043f-4f6c-a998-dd91c3eaa34an%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>> .
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "weewx-user" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/95f8e263-0d64-46de-bf3e-e6089756f45an%40googlegroups.com
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/95f8e263-0d64-46de-bf3e-e6089756f45an%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "weewx-user" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/f1192f7e-f6f8-4221-bc5f-79da5a697868n%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/f1192f7e-f6f8-4221-bc5f-79da5a697868n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"weewx-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/CAPq0zEBAHKQ8YCVeM6E-5rhpt7MXp0fOL4uaqqk8bFFf%2B_XTWg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to