Thanks, Gary. The typo was here, not in seasons.inc. But I had another
assumption: When displaying the values $current.txBatteryStatus.raw and
$current.wh65_battery.raw , I could see, that the first one was empty, and
only the second value was existent. My assumption was, that $
day.txBatteryStatus had data from time of this day before switching from
interceptor to gw1000 driver, but $day.wh65_battery did not (yet).
So I tried this modification:
#set $have_battery_status = 0
#for $x in [$day.txBatteryStatus, $day.wh65_battery,
$day.windBatteryStatus, $day.rainBatteryStatus, $day.outTempBatteryStatus,
$day.inTempBatteryStatus]
#if $x.has_data
#set $have_battery_status = 1
#end if
#end for
If this was true, I expected, that the sensor section would be present
today, because
#if $have_battery_status
<tr><th>Batterie Status</th><th></th></tr>
#if $day.txBatteryStatus.has_data
<tr>
<td class="label">$obs.label.wh65_batteryStatus</td>
<td class="data">$get_battery_status($current.wh65_battery.raw)</td>
</tr>
#end if
should result in the header line but no "Transmitter" data, because
$have_battery_status being true, but no content, because
$day.txBatteryStatus.has_data was supposed to be wrong since today.
However, unfortunately, the complete section disappeared. So, my assumption
is true only partially: Today there is no more $day.txBatteryStatus, but,
surprise, there isn't $day.wh65_battery either.
What is wrong with it?
gjr80 schrieb am Donnerstag, 17. Dezember 2020 um 21:21:10 UTC+1:
> Peter,
>
> Your understanding is correct. The logic in the code now appears correct
> but I think you are using the incorrect field name. Earlier you posted an
> archive record:
>
> REC: 2020-12-16 13:30:00 CET (1608121800) altimeter:
> 30.09246486970751, appTemp: 46.07291271146897, barometer:
> 30.092169667712717, cloudbase: 944.6426189788297, dateTime: 1608121800,
> daymaxwind: 3.6, dayRain: 0.0, dewpoint: 45.0455158818643, ET:
> 0.00012174671890853505, extraTemp1: 124.89439999999999, heatindex:
> 47.403000000000006, humidex: 48.934644083871206, inDewpoint:
> 50.88299985988465, inHumidity: 60.0, inTemp: 65.12, interval: 5.0,
> luminosity: 8184.0, maxSolarRad: 86.02828823732644, monthRain:
> 0.6653543307086613, outHumidity: 87.0, outTemp: 48.74, pressure:
> 29.97589031125, radiation: 64.59352801894238, rain: 0.0, rainEvent:
> 0.4015748031496063, rainRate: 0.0, relbarometer: 1019.2, usUnits: 1, UV:
> 0.0, uvradiation: 6.5, weekRain: 10.9, wh65_battery: 0.0, windchill:
> 48.74, windDir: 187.0, windGust: 3.3554127779089566, windGustDir: 187,
> windrun: 0.22369418519393044, windSpeed: 2.6843302223271652, yearRain:
> 29.17716535433071
>
> The field name is wh65_battery not wh_65battery. Anywhere you use $day or
> $current to access the WH65 battery state you need to be using
> $day.wh65_battery or $current.wh65_battery.
>
> Gary
>
> On Thursday, 17 December 2020 at 22:38:50 UTC+10 Vetti52 wrote:
>
>> Aaah, now I start to understand! The first part is just a definition. Got
>> it! Thanks!!!!
>>
>> In skin.conf stanza [Labels] [Generic] I found
>>
>> txBatteryStatus = Transmitter
>>
>> I replaced the left side with wh65_batteryStatus
>>
>> In Seasons.inc I found:
>>
>> #set $have_battery_status = 0
>> #for $x in [$day.txBatteryStatus, $day.windBatteryStatus,
>> $day.rainBatteryStatus, $day.outTempBatteryStatus, $day.inTempBatteryStatus]
>> #if $x.has_data
>> #set $have_battery_status = 1
>> #end if
>> #end for
>>
>> and later on:
>>
>> #if $have_battery_status
>> <tr><th>Batterie Status</th><th></th></tr>
>> #if $day.txBatteryStatus.has_data
>> <tr>
>> <td class="label">$obs.label.txBatteryStatus</td>
>> <td class="data">$get_battery_status($current.txBatteryStatus
>> .raw)</td>
>> </tr>
>> #end if
>>
>> I replaced all txBatteryStatus entries by wh65_battery except
>> $obs.label.wh65_batteryStatus according to the label in skin.conf.
>>
>> First, all this looks simply logic. However, now the sensors data were no
>> longer displayed at all. Checked for typos. Nope. So, my logic failed again.
>>
>> I then tried to replace all entries step by step. So, at first, it was
>> evident, that the expression #for $x in [$day.txBatteryStatus, ...
>> still results in status = 1, but not, when replaced with
>> $day.wh_65battery,.
>>
>> Ok, next step. Then I have to keep the original condition also here:
>>
>> #if $have_battery_status
>> <tr><th>Batterie Status</th><th></th></tr>
>> #if $day.txBatteryStatus.has_data
>> <tr>
>>
>> but still use the new values in the next two lines here:
>>
>> <td class="label">$obs.label.wh65_batteryStatus</td>
>>
>> <td class="data">$get_battery_status($current.wh65_battery.raw)
>> </td>
>> </tr>
>> #end if
>>
>>
>> So, finally everything looks fine, same like the results from
>> interceptor.py. But why do I still need txBatteryStatus? Where does this
>> value come from? Obviously $current.wh65_battery returns a valid result,
>> thus providing data. But it is not suitable for evaluating $x. This is
>> still not logical to me...
>>
>> Actually to me it looks like txBatteryStatus is not the Ecowitt-client
>> field name, as mentioned in my first post here, but is an internal field
>> name in Weewx (or why is it regularily used in seasons.inc?). So, it could
>> have been much less complicated to map wh65_batt to txBatteryStatus. But
>> I am afraid, that there still was something wrong with it.
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"weewx-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/7e243d41-8d37-4aec-bc99-b787fbf145fdn%40googlegroups.com.
