Thanks Les, QC is obviously lacking at weewx.com at the moment.

I have revised the relevant stanzas in the wee_import section of the 
Utilities Guide and added a brief explanatory note as you suggest. Have 
also reworked the weeimport.py comments. Issue 652 
<https://github.com/weewx/weewx/issues/652> and commits 402db1f 
<https://github.com/weewx/weewx/commit/26f25945f231a01b80dbd102ae9b55669d2dc9ea>
 
and 26f2594 
<https://github.com/weewx/weewx/commit/26f25945f231a01b80dbd102ae9b55669d2dc9ea>
 
refer. Long story but at the moment those changes will only be visible come 
the next release, in the meantime I will get relevant changes made to the 
on-line documentation over the next day or so.

Gary
On Thursday, 25 February 2021 at 06:47:40 UTC+10 ln77 wrote:

> The documentation for wee_import says that the --from and --to date/times 
> are inclusive and exclusive, respectively.  But what is reported when an 
> import is run, and what the code actually implements, is the other way 
> around: the --from is exclusive and the --to is inclusive. (To further 
> the confusion, the comment at line 187 in weeimport.py implies that both 
> are inclusive.)  The way it is implemented makes sense given that the 
> timestamp points to the end of the archive interval, but the disparity is 
> confusing.  Assuming I’m understanding this correctly, I’d suggest the 
> utilities guide be corrected, perhaps including a brief explanation of why 
> exclusive/inclusive is the appropriate choice.
>
> That said, I’m very happy to find that wee_import does exactly what I need 
> to recover a bunch of data.  Saved me several hours of work!
>
>   -Les
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"weewx-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/831d2e68-6f2e-4e81-ad8d-5cfae7adb72an%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to