Rainer,
Can you run the driver directly again with the --live-data and
--get-all-rain-data command line options but this time add debug=3 to
each command. This should generate a number of log entries that
include the raw data being sent to and received from the GW2000. Can
you post the log output from each command please.
Gary
On Sunday, 1 May 2022 at 23:56:36 UTC+10 [email protected] wrote:
Hi Gary
just had a test run (driver only) - and the rain doesn't seem to
be handled properly yet
I have both, a WH40 and a WS90 connected to my GW2000.
The live data view both in the WebUI (2.1.4) and WS View Plus
(2.0.31) shows both rain totals
The driver however claims that there are no piezo data and for the
traditional doesn't show the yearly numbers
(as we have 01-May and beginning of the week and no rain
everything else should be zero, but not the yearly rain)
that comes with the --get-all-rain-data option; in the --live-data
option (or --test-driver) the t_rainyearyear is properly shown as
30.89 cm but no piezo data at all.
The WS90 battery and signal are shown though.
see below
any idea what is wrong - maybe also with my config ?? - the
connected sensors are all properly recognized with --sensors
cheers
Rainer
--------------
Using configuration file /etc/weewx/weewx.conf
Interrogating GW2000 at 192.168.1.46:45000 <http://192.168.1.46:45000>
   Traditional rain data:
                    Rain rate: 0.0mm/hr (0.0in/hr))
                   Event rain: ---mm (---in)
                   Daily rain: 0.0mm (0.0in)
                  Weekly rain: ---mm (---in)
                 Monthly rain: ---mm (---in)
                  Yearly rain: ---mm (---in)
   No piezo rain data available
   No rainfall reset time data available
Using configuration file /etc/weewx/weewx.conf
Interrogating GW2000 at 192.168.1.46:45000 <http://192.168.1.46:45000>
GW2000 live sensor data (2022-05-01 15:44:05 CEST (1651412645)):
absbarometer: 990.1 mbar, co2: 1094, co2_24h_avg: 908, daymaxwind:
20 kph, gustspeed: 2 kph, humid1: 48%, humid17: 52%,
humid2: 54%, humid3: 50%, humid4: 53%, humid6: 46%, humid7: 53%,
inhumid: 52%, intemp: 20.9°C, leak2: 0, light: 35688 lx,
lightningcount: 0, lightningdettime: 25-Apr-2022 15:01,
lightningdist: 34.0 km, outhumid: 49%, outtemp: 15.0°C,
pm10: 5.100µg/m³, pm10_24h_avg: 12.900µg/m³, pm251: 10.000µg/m³,
pm251_24h_avg: 16.700µg/m³, pm252: 10.000µg/m³,
pm252_24h_avg: 18.500µg/m³, pm255: 4.300µg/m³, pm255_24h_avg:
12.400µg/m³, relbarometer: 1019.2 mbar,
soilmoist1: 14%, soilmoist2: 35%, soilmoist3: 76%, soilmoist4: 25%,
t_rainday: 0.00 cm, t_rainevent: 0.00 cm, t_rainmonth: 0.00 cm,
t_rainrate: 0.00 cm/h, t_rainweek: 0.00 cm, *t_rainyear: 30.89 cm*,
temp1: 16.8°C, temp17: 21.5°C, temp2: 21.0°C, temp3: 15.9°C,
temp4: 17.1°C, temp5: -18.5°C, temp6: 25.5°C, temp7: 3.4°C,
uv: 10 W/m², uvi: 1.0, wh31_ch1_batt: 0, wh31_ch1_sig: 4,
wh31_ch2_batt: 0, wh31_ch2_sig: 4, wh31_ch3_batt: 0,
wh31_ch3_sig: 4, wh31_ch4_batt: 0, wh31_ch4_sig: 4, wh31_ch5_batt:
0, wh31_ch5_sig: 4, wh31_ch6_batt: 0, wh31_ch6_sig: 4,
wh31_ch7_batt: 0, wh31_ch7_sig: 4, wh40_batt: 1.60 V, wh40_sig: 4,
wh41_ch1_batt: 5, wh41_ch1_sig: 4, wh41_ch2_batt: 5,
wh41_ch2_sig: 4, wh45_batt: 6, wh45_sig: 4, wh51_ch1_batt: 1.30 V,
wh51_ch1_sig: 4, wh51_ch2_batt: 1.40 V, wh51_ch2_sig: 4,
wh51_ch3_batt: 1.40 V, wh51_ch3_sig: 4, wh51_ch4_batt: 1.40 V,
wh51_ch4_sig: 4, wh51_ch5_batt: None, wh51_ch5_sig: 0,
wh55_ch2_batt: 4, wh55_ch2_sig: 4, wh57_batt: 5, wh57_sig: 4,
winddir: 263°, windspeed: 0 kph, ws90_batt: 2.98 V, ws90_sig: 4
Am 01.05.2022 um 13:50 schrieb gjr80:
I've released v0.5.0b2 of the Ecowitt Gateway driver (formerly
the GW1000 driver). The extension package can be downloaded from
the driver GitHub releases page
<https://github.com/gjr80/weewx-gw1000/releases>. The driver
should support any of the GW1000, GW1100, GW2000, WH2650, WH2680
and WN1900 devices (though I have only tested against the GW
devices). The main feature of v0.5.0 is support for the
GW2000/WS90 'Wittboy' station. There are many other changes in
v0.5.0, these changes are summarised in the notes on the GitHub
v0.5.0 release page as well as in the change log. Some of these
changes will affect some WeeWX installations and I strongly urge
everyone upgrading to v0.5.0 to read through the driver Upgrade
Guide <https://github.com/gjr80/weewx-gw1000/wiki/Upgrade-Guide>,
in particular the section Upgrading to v0.5.0
<https://github.com/gjr80/weewx-gw1000/wiki/Upgrade-Guide#upgrading-to-v050>Â
before
undertaking the upgrade as some changes have the potential to
result in lost data and broken reports. Particular areas that may
require user action involve changes to rainfall field names,
redesignation of WH34 and WH35 sensors as WN34 and WN35
respectively as well as changes to WH40 and WH51 sensor battery
state data.
I also strong recommend that users run the driver directly with
the --test-driver command line option to verify the driver is
correctly configured and producing the expected data before
restarting WeeWX.
You will notice that I have started renaming the driver the
/Ecowitt Gateway/Â driver rather than the /GW1000 driver/. The
GW1000 driver intitially focussed on supporting the GW1000 though
the API used by the GW1000 was common to other devices such as
the WH2650 and WH2680. Subsequently, Ecowitt has released the
GW1100, GW2000 and WN1900 devices which all use a common API.
Ecowitt refers to the API as the Ecowitt Gateway LAN/Wi-Fi
Gateway API. For these reasons I have started the process of
changing the name of the GW1000 driver to the Ecowitt Gateway
driver. In v0.5.0 the changes are largely cosmetic and internal,
mostly centring on removing references to GW1000 or GW1100 and
replacing them with 'gateway device' or 'gateway devices'.
However, the driver filename is
still gw1000.py and wee_extensionstill lists the driver as
GW1000. I intend to change these names in a future release.
A word about the driver wiki
<https://github.com/gjr80/weewx-gw1000/wiki>. I have updated most
of the pages to reflect the changes introduced in v0.5.0 but
there are still a few that need more work. I will be updating
those over the coming days so please bear with me.
Finally, whilst I have a variety of Ecowitt devices the only
sensor suite or rain gauge I have is the WS90, so there are many
sensor combinations that I have been unable to test against
v0.5.0. I fully expect there will be issues with v0.5.0, though I
expect these will be minor. I would welcome feedback via
weewx-user on any issues identified/irregularities noticed.
Gary
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google Groups "weewx-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/e55ced7f-911c-4a25-8d16-48947608155bn%40googlegroups.com
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/e55ced7f-911c-4a25-8d16-48947608155bn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "weewx-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/ec31ae84-8f60-439c-97a5-973467c8feb2n%40googlegroups.com
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/ec31ae84-8f60-439c-97a5-973467c8feb2n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.