Hello,

My remark was about weewx, which when running was not pulling, or saving 
the data's. Even if status message seams OK : 

   1. sudo systemctl status weewx
   2. â—  weewx.service - WeeWX
   3.      Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/weewx.service; enabled; 
   preset: enabled)
   4.      Active: active (running) since Mon 2024-12-23 17:49:01 CET; 27s 
   ago
   5.        Docs: https://weewx.com/docs
   6.    Main PID: 48084 (python3)
   7.       Tasks: 1 (limit: 9252)
   8.         CPU: 156ms
   9.      CGroup: /system.slice/weewx.service
   10.              └─48084 python3 /usr/share/weewx/weewxd.py 
   /etc/weewx/weewx.conf
   11. 
   12. déc. 23 17:49:02 stationmeteo weewxd[48084]: INFO weewx.restx: 
   PWSweather: Posting not enabled.
   13. déc. 23 17:49:02 stationmeteo weewxd[48084]: INFO weewx.restx: 
   CWOP: Posting not enabled.
   14. déc. 23 17:49:02 stationmeteo weewxd[48084]: INFO weewx.restx: WOW: 
   Posting not enabled.
   15. déc. 23 17:49:02 stationmeteo weewxd[48084]: INFO weewx.restx: 
   AWEKAS: Posting not enabled.
   16. déc. 23 17:49:02 stationmeteo weewxd[48084]: INFO weewx.engine: 
   'pyephem' detected, extended almanac data is available
   17. déc. 23 17:49:02 stationmeteo weewxd[48084]: INFO __main__: 
   Starting up weewx version 5.1.0
   18. déc. 23 17:49:02 stationmeteo weewxd[48084]: INFO weewx.engine: 
   Using binding 'wx_binding' to database 'weewx'
   19. déc. 23 17:49:02 stationmeteo weewxd[48084]: INFO weewx.manager: 
   Starting backfill of daily summaries
   20. déc. 23 17:49:02 stationmeteo weewxd[48084]: INFO weewx.manager: 
   Daily summaries up to date
   21. déc. 23 17:49:02 stationmeteo weewxd[48084]: INFO weewx.engine: 
   Starting main packet loop.
   22. 
   
I erase the system and install Raspberry Pi OS. From this new point, I 
install weewx and interceptor following this page : 
https://github.com/weewx/weewx/wiki/gw1000-recipe. 
I created access point, and then modify weewx.con accordingly.
Again same behavior, with weewxd, data's are recorded. But with the deamon 
there are not recorded !

Did have some one already see this behavior ?

Thanks you for your help
Jean-Marie

Le vendredi 20 décembre 2024 à 01:06:49 UTC+1, Robert Turner a écrit :

> I think it is normal that weewxd is running. When I installed it the 
> weewxd was automatically setup to run. I believe it would depend on how you 
> installed it. Installing with apt it automatically sets up the daemon to 
> run in the background.
>
> On Thursday, December 19, 2024 at 3:18:50 PM UTC-5 Jean-Marie Schneider 
> wrote:
>
>> Sorry to be unclear, between my English and my explantation, even simple 
>> situation to explain could come complicated !
>>
>> Here is screen capture of the recorded data's from Monday : 
>> [image: Capture d’écran 2024-12-19 210915.jpg]
>> The beginning of the trace correspond to weewxd running. Then I run weewx 
>> as daemon, no data recorded in the database,  and no trace. I did this two 
>> times (weewxd, weewx, weewxd, weewx) with the same results. Now only weewxd 
>> is running without interruption from that third run.
>>
>> I try to find error in the log's, but I see nothing. But perhaps I have 
>> not open the good file !
>>
>> So the driver is capturing data and stored in the database with weewxd, 
>> but not with weewx...
>>
>> Le jeudi 19 décembre 2024 à 03:02:33 UTC+1, Robert Turner a écrit :
>>
>>> Are you saying that the data is not stored in the database? I was 
>>> thinking that your post was a little unclear. I'm not too sure I can solve 
>>> that problem which is strange if the driver is running capturing the data.
>>>
>>> On Monday, December 16, 2024 at 2:02:43 PM UTC-5 Jean-Marie Schneider 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I did not found where is coming this issue. And surprisingly when I run 
>>>> weewxd, data's are correctly save into the database !
>>>> Any help will be appreciated ;) !
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Le dimanche 15 décembre 2024 à 11:49:59 UTC+1, Jean-Marie Schneider a 
>>>> écrit :
>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> Robert I use your Interceptor.py file, and your conf set as you. 
>>>>> it is OK for receiving the data's : 
>>>>> ~ $ sudo weewxd
>>>>> Using configuration file /etc/weewx/weewx.conf
>>>>> LOOP:   2024-12-15 11:44:09 CET (1734259449) 'altimeter': 'None', 
>>>>> 'appTemp': '45.17646502340741', 'barometer': '30.11', 'cloudbase': 
>>>>> '454.4292200824276', 'dateTime': '1734259449', 'dewpoint': '47.2', 'ET': 
>>>>> 'None', 'heatindex': '46.603', 'humidex': '48.589000630562424', 
>>>>> 'inDewpoint': 'None', 'maxSolarRad': '248.1637619033187', 'outHumidity': 
>>>>> '99.0', 'outTemp': '47.5', 'pressure': 'None', 'rain': 'None', 
>>>>> 'rainRate': 
>>>>> '0.0', 'usUnits': '1', 'UV': '0.0', 'windchill': '47.5', 'windDir': 
>>>>> '20.0', 
>>>>> 'windGust': '4.4', 'windrun': 'None', 'windSpeed': '3.0'
>>>>> LOOP:   2024-12-15 11:45:14 CET (1734259514) 'altimeter': 'None', 
>>>>> 'appTemp': '45.90871472340741', 'barometer': '30.11', 'cloudbase': 
>>>>> '454.4292200824276', 'dateTime': '1734259514', 'dewpoint': '47.2', 'ET': 
>>>>> 'None', 'heatindex': '46.603', 'humidex': '48.589000630562424', 
>>>>> 'inDewpoint': 'None', 'maxSolarRad': '249.19217896926534', 'outHumidity': 
>>>>> '99.0', 'outTemp': '47.5', 'pressure': 'None', 'rain': '0.0', 'rainRate': 
>>>>> '0.0', 'usUnits': '1', 'UV': '0.0', 'windchill': '47.5', 'windDir': 
>>>>> '7.0', 
>>>>> 'windGust': '3.4', 'windrun': 'None', 'windSpeed': '1.7'
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks you Robert for this updated file.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now run the daemon, the database is created but not data's are saved. 
>>>>> I will search for this issu !
>>>>>
>>>>> Had a good end of week end !
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Le samedi 14 décembre 2024 à 23:36:16 UTC+1, Jean-Marie Schneider a 
>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>>> Robert, I will try tomorrow, after a good nigh hopefully !
>>>>>> And I have a doubt about my installation of weewx. Let see 
>>>>>> tomorrow... 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Le samedi 14 décembre 2024 à 22:16:40 UTC+1, Robert Turner a écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is how my conf is set.
>>>>>>> [Interceptor]
>>>>>>>     driver = user.interceptor
>>>>>>>     device_type = wu-client
>>>>>>>     mode = sniff
>>>>>>>     iface = wlan0
>>>>>>>     pcap_filter = src 192.168.5.131 and dst port 80
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are you using the original interceptor.py or the one I modified?
>>>>>>> On Saturday, December 14, 2024 at 4:04:58 PM UTC-5 Jean-Marie 
>>>>>>> Schneider wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks you Robert. I try it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have set an AP, and this time I see the flow of data between my 
>>>>>>>> station and wunderground.com :
>>>>>>>> 37 130.019998 10.42.0.13 34.232.250.77 HTTP 402 GET 
>>>>>>>> /weatherstation/updateweatherstation.php?ID=ISAINT8047&PASSWORD=abc456&dateutc=2024-12-11+18%3A50%3A3&baromin=29.92&tempf=40.7&humidity=86&dewptf=36.7&rainin=0&dailyrainin=0&winddir=267&windspeedmph=3.2&windgustmph=4.9&UV=0&solarRadiation=0
>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>> HTTP/1.1
>>>>>>>> Frame 5: 403 bytes on wire (3224 bits), 403 bytes captured (3224 
>>>>>>>> bits)
>>>>>>>> Ethernet II, Src: BouffaloLab_ab:75:d3 (b8:3d:fb:ab:75:d3), Dst: 
>>>>>>>> RaspberryPi_5d:f0:b2 (2c:cf:67:5d:f0:b2)
>>>>>>>>     Destination: RaspberryPi_5d:f0:b2 (2c:cf:67:5d:f0:b2)
>>>>>>>>     Source: BouffaloLab_ab:75:d3 (b8:3d:fb:ab:75:d3)
>>>>>>>>     Type: IPv4 (0x0800)
>>>>>>>>     [Stream index: 0]
>>>>>>>> Internet Protocol Version 4, Src: 10.42.0.13, Dst: 34.232.250.77
>>>>>>>> Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: 53970, Dst Port: 80, Seq: 
>>>>>>>> 1, Ack: 1, Len: 349
>>>>>>>>     Source Port: 53970
>>>>>>>>     Destination Port: 80
>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>> I perform a first modification with port setting : 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [Interceptor]
>>>>>>>>     driver = user.interceptor
>>>>>>>>     iface = wlan0
>>>>>>>>     port = 53970
>>>>>>>>     pcap_filter = src 10.42.0.13
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Weewxd run, as well weewx, but no data are obtained. I discover 
>>>>>>>> that the port is dynamically set (next connexion, it is 53971, and so 
>>>>>>>> one.
>>>>>>>> But, if a don't set the port, weewx did not start with the 
>>>>>>>> following error :
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ERROR weewx.engine: Import of driver failed: [Errno 13] Permission 
>>>>>>>> non accordée (<class 'PermissionError'>)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I read the page of permissions  
>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/weewx/weewx/wiki/Understanding-permissions#how-to-fix-network-permissions>
>>>>>>>>  and 
>>>>>>>> allowing no method seams easy, especially as the port used by my pws 
>>>>>>>> is 
>>>>>>>> upper than 1024, the simpler will be to listen all the port upper than 
>>>>>>>> 1024, or some thing like this. But I have till now not found how to 
>>>>>>>> set 
>>>>>>>> that filter. Any help will be welcome !
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jean-Marie
>>>>>>>> Le jeudi 12 décembre 2024 à 00:16:27 UTC+1, Robert Turner a écrit :
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This version of the interceptor will be able to sniff the WLAN0 in 
>>>>>>>>> AP mode.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, December 10, 2024 at 4:22:47 PM UTC-5 Jean-Marie 
>>>>>>>>> Schneider wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks you for yours answer. 
>>>>>>>>>> @vince : I am such of the IP. As already said, turning of the WS 
>>>>>>>>>> let the ping without answer. And the four Devolo are recognize by 
>>>>>>>>>> Advance 
>>>>>>>>>> IP Scanner. They have a different IP than the WS.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> @Robert : I will learn how to set up an access point, and come 
>>>>>>>>>> back with the results.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Le mardi 10 décembre 2024 à 03:10:37 UTC+1, Robert Turner a 
>>>>>>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not completely sure of your network layout. I believe you 
>>>>>>>>>>> can't sniff wifi traffic with just connecting to the same wifi 
>>>>>>>>>>> network. 
>>>>>>>>>>> Traffic from a device on wifi going to the internet is not 
>>>>>>>>>>> rebroadcast to 
>>>>>>>>>>> all devices on the wifi. If your device is connected to wifi and 
>>>>>>>>>>> it's 
>>>>>>>>>>> sending data to the internet it would go through the wifi router to 
>>>>>>>>>>> the WAN 
>>>>>>>>>>> port of the router. It wouldn't show up on the Wifi network or LAN. 
>>>>>>>>>>> You 
>>>>>>>>>>> possibly could tap it by mirroring the data on the WAN port. 
>>>>>>>>>>> I did do this a little differently with my wifi weather station. 
>>>>>>>>>>> I configured the pi to be an access point with its wireless adapter 
>>>>>>>>>>> and the 
>>>>>>>>>>> ethernet port connected to my router. I setup the access point on 
>>>>>>>>>>> the pi to 
>>>>>>>>>>> route to the ethernet port and connected the weather station to the 
>>>>>>>>>>> pi 
>>>>>>>>>>> access point. I modified the interceptor to use tcpdump to capture 
>>>>>>>>>>> data on 
>>>>>>>>>>> the pi wlan0. The modification was necessary because the 
>>>>>>>>>>> interceptor was 
>>>>>>>>>>> not able to sniff the wlan0 on the pi when it was in access point 
>>>>>>>>>>> mode.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, December 9, 2024 at 3:12:28 PM UTC-5 vince wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Your wireshark sniffer settings have to be incorrect.  My wild 
>>>>>>>>>>>> guess in the absence of a network diagram showing which address is 
>>>>>>>>>>>> where 
>>>>>>>>>>>> would be that your Devolo LAN PLC is the source address to WU, not 
>>>>>>>>>>>> the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> address of the weather station.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, December 9, 2024 at 11:51:34 AM UTC-8 Jean-Marie 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Schneider wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have set up a VEVOR 7-in-1 Wi-Fi Weather Station and would 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> like to connect it to WeeWX.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe that the WeeWX-interceptor could be a solution, or 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at least worth trying! I installed WeeWX and the interceptor 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> without any 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues. Before attempting to connect my station, I want to verify 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the data 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> being sent to wunderground.com, where my station transmits 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> its data, or at least check if I can see them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> My configuration is as follows:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>    - The weather station is connected via Wi-Fi to a Devolo 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>    Wi-Fi network (using Powerline Communication, PLC).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>    - The reception is done by the Devolo LAN (through PLC).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>    - The Devolo LAN is connected to my router.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> From my computer, which is also connected through the Devolo 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wi-Fi, I determined the station's IP address using ZeNMAP 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (confirmed by 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> powering off the station: when I ping the IP, I get no response 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> from the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> station). Using Wireshark, I monitor the flow on the Wi-Fi 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (wlan0), and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is a lot of traffic. I applied a filter for the station's 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> IP address, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> but then I observe nothing—no traffic!?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I also scanned the LAN, but still no additional data.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Next, I placed an Ethernet Network Tap between the router and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Devolo LAN. I connected a Raspberry Pi to this tap and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> monitored the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> LAN activity using tcpdump, but again, there was nothing related 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to my 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> station.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm struggling to understand why! The station's data is 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> visible on the Wunderground site, updated every minute. It's not 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> a pigeon 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> delivering the data... So, my question is: what am I doing wrong?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"weewx-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/76f0b604-92cb-4f8d-92fe-4c19454a835fn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to