Tcpdump needs permission if not running as root. This link gives info on 
how to give the permission. 
https://askubuntu.com/questions/530920/tcpdump-permissions-problem
On Monday, December 23, 2024 at 3:26:37 PM UTC-5 Jean-Marie Schneider wrote:

> Thanks you Vince.
>
> I have an error : déc. 23 17:49:02 stationmeteo weewxd[48084]: ERROR 
> user.interceptor: tcpdump process died: tcpdump: wlan0: You don't have 
> permission to perform this capture on that device
>                                               (socket: Operation not 
> permitted)
>
> So error is located. But how can I solve that ? 
> Where I have to put that permission ? 
>
> Sorry for this question, I am using Linux rarely !
> Le lundi 23 décembre 2024 à 18:57:42 UTC+1, vince a écrit :
>
>> What account are you running  "python3 /usr/share/weewx/weewxd.py 
>> /etc/weewx/weewx.conf" under ?
>>
>> For logs, please read 
>> https://github.com/weewx/weewx/wiki/view-logs#journalctl and see if "sudo 
>> journalctl -u weewx" shows your logs. It always helps to set debug=1 in 
>> your weewx.conf file so please do so if you have not done so already.
>>
>> On Monday, December 23, 2024 at 9:00:43 AM UTC-8 Jean-Marie Schneider 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> My remark was about weewx, which when running was not pulling, or saving 
>>> the data's. Even if status message seams OK : 
>>>
>>>    1. sudo systemctl status weewx
>>>    2. â— weewx.service - WeeWX
>>>    3.      Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/weewx.service; enabled; 
>>>    preset: enabled)
>>>    4.      Active: active (running) since Mon 2024-12-23 17:49:01 CET; 
>>>    27s ago
>>>    5.        Docs: https://weewx.com/docs
>>>    6.    Main PID: 48084 (python3)
>>>    7.       Tasks: 1 (limit: 9252)
>>>    8.         CPU: 156ms
>>>    9.      CGroup: /system.slice/weewx.service
>>>    10.              └─48084 python3 /usr/share/weewx/weewxd.py 
>>>    /etc/weewx/weewx.conf
>>>    11. 
>>>    12. déc. 23 17:49:02 stationmeteo weewxd[48084]: INFO weewx.restx: 
>>>    PWSweather: Posting not enabled.
>>>    13. déc. 23 17:49:02 stationmeteo weewxd[48084]: INFO weewx.restx: 
>>>    CWOP: Posting not enabled.
>>>    14. déc. 23 17:49:02 stationmeteo weewxd[48084]: INFO weewx.restx: 
>>>    WOW: Posting not enabled.
>>>    15. déc. 23 17:49:02 stationmeteo weewxd[48084]: INFO weewx.restx: 
>>>    AWEKAS: Posting not enabled.
>>>    16. déc. 23 17:49:02 stationmeteo weewxd[48084]: INFO weewx.engine: 
>>>    'pyephem' detected, extended almanac data is available
>>>    17. déc. 23 17:49:02 stationmeteo weewxd[48084]: INFO __main__: 
>>>    Starting up weewx version 5.1.0
>>>    18. déc. 23 17:49:02 stationmeteo weewxd[48084]: INFO weewx.engine: 
>>>    Using binding 'wx_binding' to database 'weewx'
>>>    19. déc. 23 17:49:02 stationmeteo weewxd[48084]: INFO 
>>>    weewx.manager: Starting backfill of daily summaries
>>>    20. déc. 23 17:49:02 stationmeteo weewxd[48084]: INFO 
>>>    weewx.manager: Daily summaries up to date
>>>    21. déc. 23 17:49:02 stationmeteo weewxd[48084]: INFO weewx.engine: 
>>>    Starting main packet loop.
>>>    22. 
>>>    
>>> I erase the system and install Raspberry Pi OS. From this new point, I 
>>> install weewx and interceptor following this page : 
>>> https://github.com/weewx/weewx/wiki/gw1000-recipe. 
>>> I created access point, and then modify weewx.con accordingly.
>>> Again same behavior, with weewxd, data's are recorded. But with the 
>>> deamon there are not recorded !
>>>
>>> Did have some one already see this behavior ?
>>>
>>> Thanks you for your help
>>> Jean-Marie
>>>
>>> Le vendredi 20 décembre 2024 à 01:06:49 UTC+1, Robert Turner a écrit :
>>>
>>>> I think it is normal that weewxd is running. When I installed it the 
>>>> weewxd was automatically setup to run. I believe it would depend on how 
>>>> you 
>>>> installed it. Installing with apt it automatically sets up the daemon to 
>>>> run in the background.
>>>>
>>>> On Thursday, December 19, 2024 at 3:18:50 PM UTC-5 Jean-Marie Schneider 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Sorry to be unclear, between my English and my explantation, even 
>>>>> simple situation to explain could come complicated !
>>>>>
>>>>> Here is screen capture of the recorded data's from Monday : 
>>>>> [image: Capture d’écran 2024-12-19 210915.jpg]
>>>>> The beginning of the trace correspond to weewxd running. Then I run 
>>>>> weewx as daemon, no data recorded in the database,  and no trace. I did 
>>>>> this two times (weewxd, weewx, weewxd, weewx) with the same results. Now 
>>>>> only weewxd is running without interruption from that third run.
>>>>>
>>>>> I try to find error in the log's, but I see nothing. But perhaps I 
>>>>> have not open the good file !
>>>>>
>>>>> So the driver is capturing data and stored in the database with 
>>>>> weewxd, but not with weewx...
>>>>>
>>>>> Le jeudi 19 décembre 2024 à 03:02:33 UTC+1, Robert Turner a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>>> Are you saying that the data is not stored in the database? I was 
>>>>>> thinking that your post was a little unclear. I'm not too sure I can 
>>>>>> solve 
>>>>>> that problem which is strange if the driver is running capturing the 
>>>>>> data.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Monday, December 16, 2024 at 2:02:43 PM UTC-5 Jean-Marie Schneider 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I did not found where is coming this issue. And surprisingly when I 
>>>>>>> run weewxd, data's are correctly save into the database !
>>>>>>> Any help will be appreciated ;) !
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Le dimanche 15 décembre 2024 à 11:49:59 UTC+1, Jean-Marie Schneider 
>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Robert I use your Interceptor.py file, and your conf set as you. 
>>>>>>>> it is OK for receiving the data's : 
>>>>>>>> ~ $ sudo weewxd
>>>>>>>> Using configuration file /etc/weewx/weewx.conf
>>>>>>>> LOOP:   2024-12-15 11:44:09 CET (1734259449) 'altimeter': 'None', 
>>>>>>>> 'appTemp': '45.17646502340741', 'barometer': '30.11', 'cloudbase': 
>>>>>>>> '454.4292200824276', 'dateTime': '1734259449', 'dewpoint': '47.2', 
>>>>>>>> 'ET': 
>>>>>>>> 'None', 'heatindex': '46.603', 'humidex': '48.589000630562424', 
>>>>>>>> 'inDewpoint': 'None', 'maxSolarRad': '248.1637619033187', 
>>>>>>>> 'outHumidity': 
>>>>>>>> '99.0', 'outTemp': '47.5', 'pressure': 'None', 'rain': 'None', 
>>>>>>>> 'rainRate': 
>>>>>>>> '0.0', 'usUnits': '1', 'UV': '0.0', 'windchill': '47.5', 'windDir': 
>>>>>>>> '20.0', 
>>>>>>>> 'windGust': '4.4', 'windrun': 'None', 'windSpeed': '3.0'
>>>>>>>> LOOP:   2024-12-15 11:45:14 CET (1734259514) 'altimeter': 'None', 
>>>>>>>> 'appTemp': '45.90871472340741', 'barometer': '30.11', 'cloudbase': 
>>>>>>>> '454.4292200824276', 'dateTime': '1734259514', 'dewpoint': '47.2', 
>>>>>>>> 'ET': 
>>>>>>>> 'None', 'heatindex': '46.603', 'humidex': '48.589000630562424', 
>>>>>>>> 'inDewpoint': 'None', 'maxSolarRad': '249.19217896926534', 
>>>>>>>> 'outHumidity': 
>>>>>>>> '99.0', 'outTemp': '47.5', 'pressure': 'None', 'rain': '0.0', 
>>>>>>>> 'rainRate': 
>>>>>>>> '0.0', 'usUnits': '1', 'UV': '0.0', 'windchill': '47.5', 'windDir': 
>>>>>>>> '7.0', 
>>>>>>>> 'windGust': '3.4', 'windrun': 'None', 'windSpeed': '1.7'
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks you Robert for this updated file.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Now run the daemon, the database is created but not data's are 
>>>>>>>> saved. I will search for this issu !
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Had a good end of week end !
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Le samedi 14 décembre 2024 à 23:36:16 UTC+1, Jean-Marie Schneider a 
>>>>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Robert, I will try tomorrow, after a good nigh hopefully !
>>>>>>>>> And I have a doubt about my installation of weewx. Let see 
>>>>>>>>> tomorrow... 
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Le samedi 14 décembre 2024 à 22:16:40 UTC+1, Robert Turner a 
>>>>>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This is how my conf is set.
>>>>>>>>>> [Interceptor]
>>>>>>>>>>     driver = user.interceptor
>>>>>>>>>>     device_type = wu-client
>>>>>>>>>>     mode = sniff
>>>>>>>>>>     iface = wlan0
>>>>>>>>>>     pcap_filter = src 192.168.5.131 and dst port 80
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Are you using the original interceptor.py or the one I modified?
>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, December 14, 2024 at 4:04:58 PM UTC-5 Jean-Marie 
>>>>>>>>>> Schneider wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks you Robert. I try it.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I have set an AP, and this time I see the flow of data between 
>>>>>>>>>>> my station and wunderground.com :
>>>>>>>>>>> 37 130.019998 10.42.0.13 34.232.250.77 HTTP 402 GET 
>>>>>>>>>>> /weatherstation/updateweatherstation.php?ID=ISAINT8047&PASSWORD=abc456&dateutc=2024-12-11+18%3A50%3A3&baromin=29.92&tempf=40.7&humidity=86&dewptf=36.7&rainin=0&dailyrainin=0&winddir=267&windspeedmph=3.2&windgustmph=4.9&UV=0&solarRadiation=0
>>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>> HTTP/1.1
>>>>>>>>>>> Frame 5: 403 bytes on wire (3224 bits), 403 bytes captured (3224 
>>>>>>>>>>> bits)
>>>>>>>>>>> Ethernet II, Src: BouffaloLab_ab:75:d3 (b8:3d:fb:ab:75:d3), Dst: 
>>>>>>>>>>> RaspberryPi_5d:f0:b2 (2c:cf:67:5d:f0:b2)
>>>>>>>>>>>     Destination: RaspberryPi_5d:f0:b2 (2c:cf:67:5d:f0:b2)
>>>>>>>>>>>     Source: BouffaloLab_ab:75:d3 (b8:3d:fb:ab:75:d3)
>>>>>>>>>>>     Type: IPv4 (0x0800)
>>>>>>>>>>>     [Stream index: 0]
>>>>>>>>>>> Internet Protocol Version 4, Src: 10.42.0.13, Dst: 34.232.250.77
>>>>>>>>>>> Transmission Control Protocol, Src Port: 53970, Dst Port: 80, 
>>>>>>>>>>> Seq: 1, Ack: 1, Len: 349
>>>>>>>>>>>     Source Port: 53970
>>>>>>>>>>>     Destination Port: 80
>>>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>>> I perform a first modification with port setting : 
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [Interceptor]
>>>>>>>>>>>     driver = user.interceptor
>>>>>>>>>>>     iface = wlan0
>>>>>>>>>>>     port = 53970
>>>>>>>>>>>     pcap_filter = src 10.42.0.13
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Weewxd run, as well weewx, but no data are obtained. I discover 
>>>>>>>>>>> that the port is dynamically set (next connexion, it is 53971, and 
>>>>>>>>>>> so one.
>>>>>>>>>>> But, if a don't set the port, weewx did not start with the 
>>>>>>>>>>> following error :
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ERROR weewx.engine: Import of driver failed: [Errno 13] 
>>>>>>>>>>> Permission non accordée (<class 'PermissionError'>)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I read the page of permissions  
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/weewx/weewx/wiki/Understanding-permissions#how-to-fix-network-permissions>
>>>>>>>>>>>  and 
>>>>>>>>>>> allowing no method seams easy, especially as the port used by my 
>>>>>>>>>>> pws is 
>>>>>>>>>>> upper than 1024, the simpler will be to listen all the port upper 
>>>>>>>>>>> than 
>>>>>>>>>>> 1024, or some thing like this. But I have till now not found how to 
>>>>>>>>>>> set 
>>>>>>>>>>> that filter. Any help will be welcome !
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Marie
>>>>>>>>>>> Le jeudi 12 décembre 2024 à 00:16:27 UTC+1, Robert Turner a 
>>>>>>>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> This version of the interceptor will be able to sniff the WLAN0 
>>>>>>>>>>>> in AP mode.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, December 10, 2024 at 4:22:47 PM UTC-5 Jean-Marie 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Schneider wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks you for yours answer. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> @vince : I am such of the IP. As already said, turning of the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> WS let the ping without answer. And the four Devolo are recognize 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> by 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Advance IP Scanner. They have a different IP than the WS.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Robert : I will learn how to set up an access point, and come 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> back with the results.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le mardi 10 décembre 2024 à 03:10:37 UTC+1, Robert Turner a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not completely sure of your network layout. I believe you 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can't sniff wifi traffic with just connecting to the same wifi 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> network. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Traffic from a device on wifi going to the internet is not 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rebroadcast to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all devices on the wifi. If your device is connected to wifi and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sending data to the internet it would go through the wifi router 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the WAN 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> port of the router. It wouldn't show up on the Wifi network or 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LAN. You 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possibly could tap it by mirroring the data on the WAN port. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I did do this a little differently with my wifi weather 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> station. I configured the pi to be an access point with its 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wireless 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adapter and the ethernet port connected to my router. I setup 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the access 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point on the pi to route to the ethernet port and connected the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> weather 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> station to the pi access point. I modified the interceptor to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use tcpdump 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to capture data on the pi wlan0. The modification was necessary 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interceptor was not able to sniff the wlan0 on the pi when it 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was in access 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> point mode.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, December 9, 2024 at 3:12:28 PM UTC-5 vince wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your wireshark sniffer settings have to be incorrect.  My 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wild guess in the absence of a network diagram showing which 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> address is 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> where would be that your Devolo LAN PLC is the source address 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to WU, not 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the address of the weather station.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, December 9, 2024 at 11:51:34 AM UTC-8 Jean-Marie 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Schneider wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have set up a VEVOR 7-in-1 Wi-Fi Weather Station and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would like to connect it to WeeWX.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe that the WeeWX-interceptor could be a solution, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or at least worth trying! I installed WeeWX and the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interceptor without any 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues. Before attempting to connect my station, I want to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> verify the data 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being sent to wunderground.com, where my station transmits 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its data, or at least check if I can see them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My configuration is as follows:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    - The weather station is connected via Wi-Fi to a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    Devolo Wi-Fi network (using Powerline Communication, PLC).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    - The reception is done by the Devolo LAN (through PLC).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    - The Devolo LAN is connected to my router.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From my computer, which is also connected through the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Devolo Wi-Fi, I determined the station's IP address using 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ZeNMAP (confirmed 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by powering off the station: when I ping the IP, I get no 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> response from the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> station). Using Wireshark, I monitor the flow on the Wi-Fi 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (wlan0), and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is a lot of traffic. I applied a filter for the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> station's IP address, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but then I observe nothing—no traffic!?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I also scanned the LAN, but still no additional data.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Next, I placed an Ethernet Network Tap between the router 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and the Devolo LAN. I connected a Raspberry Pi to this tap and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> monitored 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the LAN activity using tcpdump, but again, there was nothing 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> related to my 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> station.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm struggling to understand why! The station's data is 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> visible on the Wunderground site, updated every minute. It's 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not a pigeon 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> delivering the data... So, my question is: what am I doing 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrong?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"weewx-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/f0217a1a-fc74-4a1d-8e36-3ffdaf2bcbfan%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to