--- Eleanor Keyser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is repulsive if the situation is what it first appears, but I > wonder if it's possible this couple was involved in a D/S lifestyle > relationship that has now soured. Doesn't sound like it, but > couples in the lifestyle often do have contracts with very similar > specifications and reward/punishment systems. Most of these > relationships are consensual and healthy. I was thinking the same thing about the D/S lifestyle as well, except that in typical D/S relationships, it's the sub that truly has the power. They get to define the parameters of what is done to them and how they are treated. One utterance of the safety word and playtime is over. > In any event, something > went wrong somewhere, and there is NEVER any lifestyle justification > for child pornography (defining child porn however...thornier issue > than you might think.) I don't think it's as thorny as defining porn itself, though. Yeah, we probably all had pictures taken by our parents where we're naked as jaybirds. Of course, being naked isn't the only yardstick. Witness JonBenet. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/weingartenchatters/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
