Re: [wc] sad sad sad

[Daria Akers]

What completely floors me (And I am even madder now Max.. Thanks a lot) is the inablility to view the breast as anything other than a sexual item. A full breast providing milk to a baby was the intention of the organ... not a toy with which to pretend to turn in Tokyo Rose. Alas people rarely see them as anything other than sexual objects.

Oh I should just stopped reading this thread.

Daria

 

On 8/4/06, Max H. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I wish I could say I was surprised. With the recent idiocy at
LiveJournal [http://www.promom.org/bf_info/mp.html ], I can't say that
I was.

At least the editor basically said they could all go take a flying
leap. I'm just glad I don't know anyone like that, because I find it
hard to be civil to people when people get huffy. Not just offended,
but huffy and sefl-righteous.

-Max H.

On 8/4/06, hermespal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>

> I'm just...speechless.
>
> http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060804/od_afp/afplifestyleussocialbreastfeeding
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

--
--Max H., moderator Freecycle Olney, MD, Freecycle Rockville

__._,_.___

SPONSORED LINKS

Identity

Flag

Guessing

---

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

•  Visit your group "weingartenchatters" on the web.
   
•  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
•  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

---

__,_._,___