Re: [wc] sad sad sad

Fri, 04 Aug 2006 11:55:18 -0700

back to the wife/husband and porn discussion:
"I was SHOCKED to see a giant breast on the cover of your magazine," one woman from Kansas wrote in reaction to the picture in Babytalk, a free magazine that caters to young mothers. "I was offended and it made my husband very uncomfortable when I left the magazine on the coffee table."

... one woman from Nevada said she "immediately turned the magazine face down" when she saw the photo.

... Another reader said she was "horrified" when she received the magazine and hoped that her husband hadn't laid eyes on it.

"I had to rip off the cover since I didn't want it laying around the house," she said.

Wow.
 
Why?  What would happen to these husbands if they saw the pic?
 
amazing.

 
On 8/4/06, Daria Akers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

What completely floors me (And I am even madder now Max.. Thanks a lot) is the inablility to view the breast as anything other than a sexual item. A full breast providing milk to a baby was the intention of the organ... not a toy with which to pretend to turn in Tokyo Rose. Alas people rarely see them as anything other than sexual objects.
Oh I should just stopped reading this thread.
Daria

 

On 8/4/06, Max H. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I wish I could say I was surprised. With the recent idiocy at
LiveJournal [http://www.promom.org/bf_info/mp.html ], I can't say that
I was.

At least the editor basically said they could all go take a flying
leap. I'm just glad I don't know anyone like that, because I find it
hard to be civil to people when people get huffy. Not just offended,
but huffy and sefl-righteous.

-Max H.



On 8/4/06, hermespal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

--
--Max H., moderator Freecycle Olney, MD, Freecycle Rockville





--
/k __._,_.___


SPONSORED LINKS
Identity Flag Guessing

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



__,_._,___

Reply via email to