Re: [wc] Re: Hugging and boobs

Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:02:10 -0700

My MIL got silicon implants sometime in the 80s. Well a few years ago she got in a mild car accident. About 6 months later she had a weird patch of skin on her shin. Well darn if the silicon from the burst implant hadn't migrated to her leg. She has had some majorly weird health problems since. If she knew then what she knows now she would never have done it.
The weird thing is I NEVER would have guessed she had implants... I mean she was soooo flat even with them.

 
On 8/10/06, Hannah Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Kind of depends how you get them - under the pectoral muscle or above.  Since the boob jobs we notice tend to be the "porn star" variety, those that are above the muscle, you really feel the saline/silicone.  Subtler (also more expensive) jobs, such as only going up one cup size or having reconstructive work, can be inserted under the pectoral muscle, and basically serve the function of pushing your natural breasts out.
 
I've never heard of anyone preferring the feel of surgically augmented breasts.  Something to keep in mind I suppose for anybody out there thinking about getting the girls 'enhanced'.  (Also, all implants leak after a certain period of time, so be prepared for the expense of 'upkeep' as well)

 

On 8/10/06, areofilm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

It's like hugging a pair of well toned biceps. Not a fan myself.

--- In [email protected] , "jmguillory"


<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Mine are not insignficant, but I've never particularly thought about
> them when hugging someone. However, a hug was how a friend of mine
> confirmed that a mutual friend's girlfriend had gotten a boob job.
> Apparently they were MUCH more firm.
>
> Jasmine
>



__._,_.___


SPONSORED LINKS
Identity Flag Guessing

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



__,_._,___

Reply via email to