Our electric popcorn popper used to cause the TV to go on the blink. 
We always thought it was some kind of wave interference.  The popcorn
popper was in a different room, but loud enough to hear in the TV room.


--- In [email protected], "Max H." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Oh, come on, I'm only in my <mumble> thirties, and I remember those
remotes
> from when I was a toddler. My parents inherited a big wooden console
TV from
> my grandparents, and it came with a big honkin' remote with all of two
> buttons that stuck up at least an inch and a half, and when you
pushed them
> all the way down (which took some effort), they made this little
"wheeet"
> sound that I probably couldn't hear now. I can't be the only one who was
> fascinated by those as a child in the seventies or earlier.
> 
> -Max H.
> 
> On 12/16/06, gina_ellis_ca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Being one, I subscribe to Straight Dope.  Today has a couple of
> > doozies, one of which you can even try out at home.
> >
> > Dear Cecil:
> >
> > I know this is going to sound crazy, but my Slinky (that's the
> > Original Slinky Walking Spring Toy) has the power to turn on, turn
> > off, and change channels on our TV set! Shortly after receiving the
> > Slinky as a birthday gift, I was watching TV and absentmindedly
> > tumbling the Slinky back and forth in my hands. The TV went off, then
> > came back on a minute or two later. At first I figured our TV was on
> > the blink. But when the TV switched itself on the next time I played
> > with the Slinky the truth dawned. Since then, all our friends and
> > visitors have experienced firsthand the power of Slinky. We can turn
> > the TV off and on and change channels. My brother was even able to
> > adjust the volume. There is no physical contact between the Slinky
> > and the TV. It works best from a chair about six feet from the set.
> > Can you explain this? --Karen Schrage, Chicago
> >
> > Cecil replies:
> >
> > It's questions like this that give me the strength to go on. To be
> > sure, I had heard of such things before. But most of the letters were
> > along the lines of the following: "How come when you hold a chopstick
> > in your teeth and pluck it, the TV screen shimmies? Nothing else
> > shimmies." Clearly a case of heavy-metal poisoning, although whether
> > from cadmium or Aerosmith is hard to say.
> >
> > Karen's letter, however, was refreshingly rational. We called to
> > check one vital detail: did the set have an ordinary remote control?
> > Karen didn't know, but the set was pretty old (it had come with the
> > apartment), and it might have had one once.
> >
> > That was all we needed to know. Prior to the early 1980s, most TV
> > remote controls communicated with the set via ultrasonic sound--
> > sound too high-pitched for the human ear to hear. Typically these
> > devices worked by striking a series of metal bars with a tiny hammer.
> > There was usually an audible click, but the frequencies that actually
> > did the job were inaudible harmonics. (You acoustics buffs will know
> > what I'm talking about.) Obviously you don't need a remote control
> > box to bang metal together, although getting the right frequencies is
> > a bit hit-and-miss.
> >
> > A call to the folks at Zenith, which introduced the first ultrasonic
> > remote control in 1956, confirmed that there had been occasional
> > reports of kids switching channels by spilling pennies onto the floor
> > from their piggy banks. We had also heard of people switching on TVs
> > by jingling their keys. When Karen told us someone had turned her set
> > on by jingling keys too, we concluded the Slinky was mimicking a long-
> > lost ultrasonic remote control.
> >
> > Unfortunately for those of you who were looking forward to a pleasant
> > evening of experimenting on your own (why stop with Slinkies? why not
> > anvils and sledgehammers, Caribbean steel drums, or samurai swords?),
> > ultrasonic remote controls are now obsolete. They've been supplanted
> > by infrared (invisible light) technology, which is better suited to
> > conveying the complex digital information needed to operate today's
> > plethora of TV controls. Nothing fun ever lasts.
> >
> > WHEN WILL I LEARN?
> >
> > Dear Cecil:
> >
> > Recently you put down an anonymous writer who asked, "How come when
> > you hold a chopstick in your teeth and pluck it, the TV screen
> > shimmies? Nothing else shimmies." You ascribed the effect to heavy
> > metal poisoning. Well, Cece, I think you dismissed the question
> > prematurely, without trying it. This effect does occur and results
> > from a vibration of the eyes (connected to the tooth bone) at a
> > frequency near that of the vertical scan rate on the TV, producing a
> > visible modulation effect of shimmying, speaking vernacularly. The
> > other objects in the visual field may appear slightly fuzzy, but they
> > don't shimmer. Chopsticks are fine, but if you want to see the effect
> > more clearly, vibrate your jaw or head with an electric vibrator
> > using different speeds while viewing TV. Hope this shakes you. Find
> > that letter and apologize. --Jim S., Dallas
> >
> > Dear Jim:
> >
> > I can't stand it. Every time I rummage through the circular file
> > looking for a letter exemplifying the depths to which the Teeming
> > Millions have sunk--believe me, you'd feel the same impulse if you
> > had this job--I come up with somebody who's tapped into some lost
> > truth of physics. As a matter of fact, I did try this silly stunt--
> > once. But not being the kind of guy who believes in doing it with the
> > shades drawn, I used a well-lit room, which made the effect a lot
> > less noticeable. Having returned to the (darkened) lab, I find that,
> > sho 'nuff, the screen does shimmy. To be more precise, it looks as
> > though it had turned into a jiggling sheet of Jell-O. Very bizarre.
> > Had we discovered this in the 60s it might have replaced the lava
> > lamp.
> >
> > A ripple effect of this sort is characteristic of interference
> > between two wavefronts, in this case the chopstick- (or spoon- or
> > crunchy candy-) induced vibration in your skull and the flicker of
> > the TV. The precise mechanism of this interference I leave to the
> > grad students to figure out, but it happens all right.
> >
> > --CECIL ADAMS
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> --Max H., moderator Freecycle Olney, MD, Freecycle Rockville
>


Reply via email to