On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 11:24, Clint Popetz <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Adam Warski <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> have you considered adding a stateless scope to Weld? >> > > I've definitely felt the paint of not having this, for all the reasons > stated. > I agree with both of you and have attempted to defend this position in the past. I thought using a dependent-scoped bean with Instance<T>#get() would be sufficient, but I didn't think about the passivation requirement. We need a truly stateless scope in CDI. I define it as a non-storing context. The reference is resolved each time the proxy dereferenced (method call). -Dan -- Dan Allen Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action Registered Linux User #231597 http://mojavelinux.com http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
_______________________________________________ weld-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
