> I agree with both of you and have attempted to defend this position in the > past. I thought using a dependent-scoped bean with Instance<T>#get() would be > sufficient, but I didn't think about the passivation requirement. We need a > truly stateless scope in CDI. I define it as a non-storing context. The > reference is resolved each time the proxy dereferenced (method call).
Hmm this may be something different - maybe as Pete writes @Unwraps. For a stateless scope the reference could be resolved once (at injection time or lazily on first method invocation), much like the dependent scope. The difference being the behavior during passivation. -- Adam Warski http://www.warski.org http://www.softwaremill.eu _______________________________________________ weld-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
