[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WELD-711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12568922#comment-12568922
]
Martin Gencur commented on WELD-711:
------------------------------------
Pete, I think the most effective way is to do a stress test for both of the new
states which are there now, it means weld/master: head=f8b0445fd and you
branch: head=c3ee8a971 and if the difference is in the one commit - make
jprofiler snapshots for both of these states . Otherwise (since you've changed
your branch) I would have to create my fork of your branch and get it into the
previous state which was tested. Agreed? I have to do it sequentially.
> Calling Contextual.destroy on an instance still references an instance on
> BeanManager
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WELD-711
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WELD-711
> Project: Weld
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Scopes & Contexts
> Affects Versions: 1.0.1.Final, 1.1.0.Beta1
> Reporter: George Gastaldi
> Assignee: Martin Gencur
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: AnnotationLiteral, MemoryLeak
> Fix For: 1.1.0.CR1
>
> Attachments: report.txt
>
>
> Using the seam-faces module @ViewScoped extension, when the object is
> destroyed by Contextual.destroy, weld still references an instance, avoiding
> being garbage-collected.
> Pseudo Code:
> Contextual contextual = ...
> Object instance = ...
> CreationalContext creational = ...
> contextual.destroy(instance, creational);
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
_______________________________________________
weld-issues mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-issues