michel memeteau wrote:
That 's what I meant as well , since jingle integrates ICE, STUN and P2P support in the meantime ..

P2P is a generic name. Gnutella for example is a decentralized P2P protocol but it is not scalable. Skype (as far as I know) uses a semi-centralized P2P architecture that is very scalable. Napster was a centralized P2P system. I guess jingle is a centralized P2P system too.

There are a lot of researches on scalable P2P systems:
http://research.microsoft.com/~antr/Pastry/
http://ntrg.cs.tcd.ie/undergrad/4ba2.02-03/p9.html
http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/chord/

This is clearly the future: everything fully decentralized and scalable (When?, how? nobody knows). TCP/IP was a success because it did put the intelligence at the border of the network like P2P systems try to achieve.

Yeaah , I didn't know that you were so close for IAX, I guess

We are not going to do it soon (what for? phApi already does what we want), but if you check the iaxclient API you will see that it works the same way as phApi and sipX so it's not big deal to integrate.

http://dev.openwengo.com/trac/openwengo/trac.cgi/browser/trunk/wengophone/src/model/sipwrapper/
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/iaxclient/iaxclient/lib/iaxclient.h?rev=1.54&view=auto

If all of this is done one day , and we have the possibility to register several SIP providers , Wengophone will be THE softphone I guess .....

That's the plan ;)

--
Tanguy Krotoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://dev.openwengo.com
_______________________________________________
Wengophone-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://dev.openwengo.com/mailman/listinfo/wengophone-devel

Reply via email to