Hi, Alec leamas wrote: > With this said, it's really hard for me to see an incremental > path leading from today's logging system to something which > works along the lines I think we need. After all, it's kind of > a refactoring, and such things can't really be done in that > many steps. I *have* divided this work into three steps (one > completed). > > OTOH, the nature of this patch is "switch backend". So there > will be a quite large window where we can revert this patch if > need be, and use the current system instead.
Your comments (implying that switching a back-end couldn't be split up into smaller steps) reminded me of a JavaNet article I read some time ago which might be useful reading for everyone: http://today.java.net/pub/a/today/2004/04/27/smallchanges.html Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Neary OpenWengo Community Development Manager Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: +33 9 51 13 46 45 Mob: +33 6 28 09 73 11 _______________________________________________ Wengophone-devel mailing list Wengophone-devel@lists.openwengo.com http://dev.openwengo.com/mailman/listinfo/wengophone-devel
