On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 21:35:38 +0100, Nils Kneuper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >There has been some discussion about this already. I think tagging campaigns > >is a much better solution that setting up multiple campaign servers. > > Sorry, but I think this won't work this nice. I would tend to leave a > campaign in the current working version on the server. If there is > only one server I need to replace ot rename the campaign so I can > upload one compatible with 1.1.x. > I would prefer to have one campaignserver for 1.0.x and one for > >1.0.x.
Yes, you would have to use a different file name for the command (under the current scheme), but the user visible title could be the same. If this is a serious problem, something could be done about that. As long as filtering can be back ported to 1.0 so that inappropiate campaigns aren't displayed in the download list one shared server should be workable.
