-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Benoit Timbert schrieb: > While i understand why a new name for the level 3 skeleton archer would be > nice, > i find this change especially bad. And according to what i've seen on IRC, a > lot > of other developer tend to agree with me (through some don't really care > much).
Jepp, I don't like it either... > - it's hard to spell correctly Definably, as campaigndesigner having to spell this unit I would start to go mad soon... > - very few people actually have heard of this name Jepp, I never before heard of it, my first impression was "hey, is this some debiancommand that found its way into wesnoth?!?". A unitname should better not look like his, it is too strange, in general I don't even understand what is so bad about "Soul Shooter"... > - it's uninformative : if doesn't realy show what the unit is. Informative > names In short: man, this name tells me *nothing*, before was a whole lot better! > So please revert this change or find a new better names for this unit. I wholeheartedly agree. Please revert to the old state again. Cheers, Nils Kneuper aka Ivanovic -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGo20afFda9thizwURAp4RAJ9veJUnAVMf8vteVfyBHl6OxRx9cwCgmcop BuXNGGE1KRZte8Nym/5JJfQ= =hTf7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Wesnoth-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
