-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 David Philippi schrieb: > I think we absolutely want the compression and adding boost was discussed > often enough to be no question as well. > Actually I'd also compress the upload to the campaign server and use > decompress / recompress there. Doesn't add much load since uploads are > infrequent but authors have less risk of connection loss due to shorter > upload times as well. > > Bye David
Sounds very reasonable to me. I am for adding those dependencies, too. Using compression makes a whole lot of sense. And yes, using it for uploading does make much sense. Cheers, Nils Kneuper aka Ivanovic -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHSbBvfFda9thizwURAsoEAJ9GM4zVnkP7tpeVPDXCkbBjdmSfiACfQClE 8rJv3efR+mW/JKe22Dp+KeI= =2Gt2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Wesnoth-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
