* jeremy rosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-26 16:06:23 CET]: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * jeremy rosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-26 15:29:49 CET]: > > > Ubuntu Hardy Heron is planned for end of April, and is currently in > > > feature freeze. > > > > > > since 1.4 is not out yet, they will probably ship 1.2... a month after > > > the 1.2 server has been shut and we stop supporting it. Not really a > > > good situation. > > > > They can't propably ship 1.2, because they already contain 1.3.19: > > > > #v+ > > $> rmadison -u ubuntu -s hardy wesnoth > > wesnoth | 1:1.2.8-1 | hardy/universe | i386 > > wesnoth | 1:1.3.19-1 | hardy/universe | source, amd64, powerpc > > #v-
Small update on that and what Nils posted: <http://packages.ubuntu.com/hardy/wesnoth> lists also 1.3.19, the minor differences (especially with respect to Architecture: all packages which the campaigns and the mentioned wesnoth-all package are) are because of that Architecture: all packages get uploaded together with the i386 build. That one is finished since some hours but not uploaded yet. So tomorrow everything should be fine for ubuntu here. > I assumed they followed the debian policy which has 1.2 in > stable/testing/unstable and 1.3 in experimental... Ubuntu doesn't have any staging area like Debian with experimental. The Ubuntu development branch (currently hardy) is most of the time directly following Debian unstable - and well, I in fact /did/ upload the 1.3 releases to unstable since 1.3.16 because that was the feature freeze point. So they are still following unstable since 1.3.19 is in unstable. :) Hope that puts some light into the confusion. :) Rhonda _______________________________________________ Wesnoth-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
