On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 11:26:18AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 11:31:50 +0200, > Mark de Wever <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 09:53:52AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > We already have non-ascii in comments for quite a while eg in > > marked-up_text.cpp the comment block starting at line 291 has a list of > > Japanese glyphs. So it doesn't break compilation. > > > > It only seems the non-ascii is not in utf-8 encoding, so I would suggest > > to change it to utf-8.
Indeed, UTF-8 is preferred. > My concern would be that this might cause problems with some compilers. No, I doubt this! > I tried searching for some information and found there is a definition > of characters required to be in the source character set. However, I am > not sure a particular encoding is required. There also wasn't any mention A encoding is definitively unimportant! There could be only two problems I'm aware of: * Tools such as doxygen failing on such files (especially if a wrong input filter such as iconv -f utf-8 -t latin1 is used which stops at the first invalid byte) * Editors could not respect the current encoding and destroy it Jens _______________________________________________ Wesnoth-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
