wesnoth-dev  

Messages by Date

• 2009/03/15 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] [bug #13166] AI is shuffling instead of finishingoff a lonely enemy leader Jörg Hinrichs
• 2009/03/15 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] [bug #13166] AI is shuffling instead of finishing off a lonely enemy leader Eric S. Raymond
• 2009/03/12 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] [Wesnoth-i18n] Announcement text for 1.6 (basically) ready for translations Yuanle Song
• 2009/03/12 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] [Wesnoth-i18n] Announcement text for 1.6 (basically) ready for translations Yuanle Song
• 2009/03/10 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] GPL link on announcement page incorrect Bruno Wolff III
• 2009/03/10 [Wesnoth-dev] Announcement text for 1.6 (basically) ready for translations Nils Kneuper
• 2009/03/10 [Wesnoth-dev] GPL link on announcement page incorrect Bruno Wolff III
• 2009/03/09 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] Announcement text for 1.6 jeremy rosen
• 2009/03/09 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] GSOC 2009 let's get the ball rolling Nils Kneuper
• 2009/03/09 [Wesnoth-dev] Announcement text for 1.6 Nils Kneuper
• 2009/03/08 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] [bug #13118] Risk of OOS with hidden units Ali
• 2009/03/07 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] [bug #13118] Risk of OOS with hidden units Jörg Hinrichs
• 2009/03/07 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] [bug #13118] Risk of OOS with hidden units John McNabb
• 2009/03/07 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] [bug #13118] Risk of OOS with hidden units Mark de Wever
• 2009/03/07 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] [bug #13118] Risk of OOS with hidden units Jörg Hinrichs
• 2009/03/06 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] AI is not in a releasable state John McNabb
• 2009/03/06 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] AI is not in a releasable state Greg Boggs
• 2009/03/06 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] AI is not in a releasable state Eric S. Raymond
• 2009/03/06 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] AI is not in a releasable state Eric S. Raymond
• 2009/03/06 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] AI is not in a releasable state Eric S. Raymond
• 2009/03/06 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] AI is not in a releasable state Eric S. Raymond
• 2009/03/06 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] AI is not in a releasable state Nils Kneuper
• 2009/03/06 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] AI is not in a releasable state Nils Kneuper
• 2009/03/06 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] AI is not in a releasable state Greg Boggs
• 2009/03/06 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] AI is not in a releasable state Fabian Mueller
• 2009/03/06 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] AI is not in a releasable state Nils Kneuper
• 2009/03/05 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] [bug #13118] Risk of OOS with hidden units Jörg Hinrichs
• 2009/03/05 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] AI is not in a releasable state David White
• 2009/03/05 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] AI is not in a releasable state Eric S. Raymond
• 2009/03/05 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] AI is not in a releasable state Eric S. Raymond
• 2009/03/05 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] AI is not in a releasable state David White
• 2009/03/05 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] AI is not in a releasable state Ignacio Morelle
• 2009/03/05 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] AI is not in a releasable state Eric S. Raymond
• 2009/03/05 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] AI is not in a releasable state Nils Kneuper
• 2009/03/05 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] AI is not in a releasable state Eric S. Raymond
• 2009/03/05 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] AI is not in a releasable state Eric S. Raymond
• 2009/03/05 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] AI is not in a releasable state John McNabb
• 2009/03/05 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] AI is not in a releasable state dave
• 2009/03/05 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] [bug #13118] Risk of OOS with hidden units Jörg Hinrichs
• 2009/03/05 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] AI is not in a releasable state Eric S. Raymond
• 2009/03/05 [Wesnoth-dev] AI is not in a releasable state Fabian Mueller
• 2009/03/05 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] [bug #13118] Risk of OOS with hidden units Jörg Hinrichs
• 2009/02/28 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] GCC 4.4 Guillaume Melquiond
• 2009/02/28 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] GCC 4.4 Mark de Wever
• 2009/02/28 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] GCC 4.4 Bruno Wolff III
• 2009/02/28 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] GCC 4.4 Bruno Wolff III
• 2009/02/24 [Wesnoth-dev] Scripting in the longer term (was: Re: possible security problems) Eric S. Raymond
• 2009/02/24 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] possible security problems (eg with current python implementation) dave
• 2009/02/24 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] possible security problems (eg with current python implementation) Greg Copeland
• 2009/02/24 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] registered at freenode, now wesnoth cloaks available Nils Kneuper
• 2009/02/24 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] possible security problems (eg with current python implementation) allefant
• 2009/02/24 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] registered at freenode, now wesnoth cloaks available Nils Kneuper
• 2009/02/24 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] possible security problems (eg with current python implementation) Sergey Popov
• 2009/02/24 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] possible security problems (eg with current python implementation) Cameron J. Morland
• 2009/02/24 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] possible security problems (eg with current python implementation) Patrick Parker
• 2009/02/24 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] possible security problems (eg with current python implementation) Greg Copeland
• 2009/02/24 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] registered at freenode, now wesnoth cloaks available jeremy rosen
• 2009/02/24 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] possible security problems (eg with current python implementation) Greg Copeland
• 2009/02/24 [Wesnoth-dev] registered at freenode, now wesnoth cloaks available Nils Kneuper
• 2009/02/24 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] build system evaluation (autotools/cmake/scons) allefant
• 2009/02/24 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] possible security problems (eg with current python implementation) allefant
• 2009/02/24 [Wesnoth-dev] Informing about a change... Mario Rodrÿffffedguez
• 2009/02/24 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] GCC 4.4 Bruno Wolff III
• 2009/02/23 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] GCC 4.4 Guillaume Melquiond
• 2009/02/23 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] GCC 4.4 Bruno Wolff III
• 2009/02/23 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] possible security problems (eg with current python implementation) dave
• 2009/02/23 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] possible security problems (eg with current python implementation) Daniel Franke
• 2009/02/23 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] possible security problems (eg with current python implementation) dave
• 2009/02/23 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] build system evaluation (autotools/cmake/scons) Sergey Popov
• 2009/02/23 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] possible security problems (eg with current python implementation) Greg Copeland
• 2009/02/23 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] build system evaluation (autotools/cmake/scons) Alexander Neundorf
• 2009/02/23 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] build system evaluation (autotools/cmake/scons) Alexander Neundorf
• 2009/02/23 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] possible security problems (eg with current python implementation) Mark de Wever
• 2009/02/23 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] possible security problems (eg with current python implementation) Mark de Wever
• 2009/02/23 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] possible security problems (eg with current python implementation) allefant
• 2009/02/23 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] possible security problems (eg with current python implementation) Sergey Popov
• 2009/02/23 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] possible security problems (eg with current python implementation) Nils Kneuper
• 2009/02/23 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] possible security problems (eg with current python implementation) Greg Copeland
• 2009/02/23 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] possible security problems (eg with current python implementation) jeremy rosen
• 2009/02/23 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] possible security problems (eg with current python implementation) David Philippi
• 2009/02/23 [Wesnoth-dev] more private IRC chan for security related discussions Nils Kneuper
• 2009/02/22 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] possible security problems (eg with current python implementation) Daniel Franke
• 2009/02/22 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] build system evaluation (autotools/cmake/scons) Daniel Franke
• 2009/02/22 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] build system evaluation (autotools/cmake/scons) Mark de Wever
• 2009/02/22 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] build system evaluation (autotools/cmake/scons) Sergey Popov
• 2009/02/22 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] build system evaluation (autotools/cmake/scons) Alexander Neundorf
• 2009/02/22 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] possible security problems (eg with current python implementation) David White
• 2009/02/22 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] build system evaluation (autotools/cmake/scons) Mark de Wever
• 2009/02/22 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] build system evaluation (autotools/cmake/scons) Mark de Wever
• 2009/02/22 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] build system evaluation (autotools/cmake/scons) Sergey Popov
• 2009/02/22 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] build system evaluation (autotools/cmake/scons) Alexander Neundorf
• 2009/02/22 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] build system evaluation (autotools/cmake/scons) Alexander Neundorf
• 2009/02/22 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] possible security problems (eg with current python implementation) jeremy rosen
• 2009/02/22 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] build system evaluation (autotools/cmake/scons) Bruno Wolff III
• 2009/02/22 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] build system evaluation (autotools/cmake/scons) Guillaume Melquiond
• 2009/02/22 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] possible security problems (eg with current python implementation) allefant
• 2009/02/22 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] possible security problems (eg with current python implementation) Mark de Wever
• 2009/02/22 [Wesnoth-dev] possible security problems (eg with current python implementation) Nils Kneuper
• 2009/02/22 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] build system evaluation (autotools/cmake/scons) Sergey Popov
• 2009/02/22 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] build system evaluation (autotools/cmake/scons) Nils Kneuper
• 2009/02/22 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] build system evaluation (autotools/cmake/scons) Mark de Wever
• 2009/02/22 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] build system evaluation (autotools/cmake/scons) Sergey Popov
• 2009/02/22 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] build system evaluation (autotools/cmake/scons) Mark de Wever
• 2009/02/22 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] build system evaluation (autotools/cmake/scons) Guillaume Melquiond
• 2009/02/22 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] build system evaluation (autotools/cmake/scons) Mark de Wever
• 2009/02/22 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] build system evaluation (autotools/cmake/scons) Sergey Popov
• 2009/02/22 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] build system evaluation (autotools/cmake/scons) Mark de Wever
• 2009/02/22 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] build system evaluation (autotools/cmake/scons) Mark de Wever
• 2009/02/22 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] build system evaluation (autotools/cmake/scons) Nils Kneuper
• 2009/02/22 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] build system evaluation (autotools/cmake/scons) Guillaume Melquiond
• 2009/02/22 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] build system evaluation (autotools/cmake/scons) Sergey Popov
• 2009/02/22 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] build system evaluation (autotools/cmake/scons) Eric S. Raymond
• 2009/02/22 [Wesnoth-dev] build system evaluation (autotools/cmake/scons) Mark de Wever
• 2009/02/21 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] Updated 1.6 release plan Mark de Wever
• 2009/02/21 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] Updated 1.6 release plan Eric S. Raymond
• 2009/02/21 [Wesnoth-dev] Transparent portraits are cool Bruno Wolff III
• 2009/02/21 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] [Wesnoth-commits] r32813 - in /trunk: changelog players_changelog src/game_preferences_display.cpp src/preferences.cpp Bruno Wolff III
• 2009/02/21 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] GCC 4.4 Bruno Wolff III
• 2009/02/21 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] GCC 4.4 Mark de Wever
• 2009/02/21 [Wesnoth-dev] Updated 1.6 release plan Nils Kneuper
• 2009/02/21 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] GCC 4.4 Bruno Wolff III
• 2009/02/20 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] [Wesnoth-commits] r32813 - in /trunk: changelog players_changelog src/game_preferences_display.cpp src/preferences.cpp Mark de Wever
• 2009/02/17 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] GCC 4.4 Bruno Wolff III
• 2009/02/16 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] [Wesnoth-commits] r32813 - in /trunk: changelog players_changelog src/game_preferences_display.cpp src/preferences.cpp Bruno Wolff III
• 2009/02/13 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] GSOC 2009 let's get the ball rolling Mark de Wever
• 2009/02/11 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] GCC 4.4 Bruno Wolff III
• 2009/02/11 [Wesnoth-dev] GSOC 2009 let's get the ball rolling jeremy rosen
• 2009/02/09 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] GCC 4.4 Mark de Wever
• 2009/02/09 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] GCC 4.4 Guillaume Melquiond
• 2009/02/08 [Wesnoth-dev] GCC 4.4 Bruno Wolff III
• 2009/02/04 [Wesnoth-dev] Pre-1.6 string fixes, and a script to make them painless Eric S. Raymond
• 2009/02/01 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] Wesnoth and LUA David White
• 2009/02/01 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] [Wesnoth-commits] r32504 - /trunk/src/image_function.hpp Ignacio Morelle
• 2009/02/01 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] [Wesnoth-commits] r32504 - /trunk/src/image_function.hpp David Philippi
• 2009/01/31 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] Wesnoth and LUA Guillaume Melquiond
• 2009/01/31 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] Approaching 1.6 and some other stuff... (planned release of 1.5.9, feature freeze, GSoC, FOSDEM, ...) Nils Kneuper
• 2009/01/30 [Wesnoth-dev] Approaching 1.6 and some other stuff... (planned release of 1.5.9, feature freeze, GSoC, FOSDEM, ...) Nils Kneuper
• 2009/01/29 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] Wesnoth and LUA jeremy rosen
• 2009/01/29 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] Wesnoth and LUA Mark de Wever
• 2009/01/29 [Wesnoth-dev] Wesnoth and LUA Guillaume Melquiond
• 2009/01/25 [Wesnoth-dev] FOSDEM 2009 discussions jeremy rosen
• 2009/01/22 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] Wesnoth refactoring and future direction plan Greg Copeland
• 2009/01/22 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] Wesnoth refactoring and future direction plan Alexander Neundorf
• 2009/01/22 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] 1.7 design direction and the great Python shift Greg Copeland
• 2009/01/22 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] 1.7 design direction and the great Python shift Greg Copeland
• 2009/01/22 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] Wesnoth refactoring and future direction plan Greg Copeland
• 2009/01/22 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] Wesnoth refactoring and future direction plan Greg Copeland
• 2009/01/22 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] 1.7 design direction and the great Python shift Greg Copeland
• 2009/01/20 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] summary upload cib
• 2009/01/18 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] summary upload Bruno Wolff III
• 2009/01/18 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] summary upload allefant
• 2009/01/17 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] summary upload Bruno Wolff III
• 2009/01/17 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] summary upload Nils Kneuper
• 2009/01/14 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] 1.7 design direction and the great Python shift Richard Kettering III
• 2009/01/08 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] 1.7 design direction and the great Python shift Arc Riley
• 2009/01/08 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] 1.7 design direction and the great Python shift Ivan Illarionov
• 2009/01/08 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] 1.7 design direction and the great Python shift Arc Riley
• 2009/01/08 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] 1.7 design direction and the great Python shift David Philippi
• 2009/01/08 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] 1.7 design direction and the great Python shift Arc Riley
• 2009/01/06 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] 1.7 design direction and the great Python shift greg
• 2009/01/06 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] Wesnoth refactoring and future direction plan Mark de Wever
• 2009/01/06 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] Wesnoth refactoring and future direction plan dave
• 2009/01/06 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] Wesnoth refactoring and future direction plan Ivan Illarionov
• 2009/01/06 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] Wesnoth refactoring and future direction plan Mark de Wever
• 2009/01/06 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] Wesnoth refactoring and future direction plan Ivan Illarionov
• 2009/01/05 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] Wesnoth refactoring and future direction plan Ivan Illarionov
• 2009/01/05 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] Wesnoth refactoring and future direction plan Eric S. Raymond
• 2009/01/05 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] Open lwetter to Ivan Illarionov Eric S. Raymond
• 2009/01/05 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] Wesnoth refactoring and future direction plan John McNabb
• 2009/01/05 [Wesnoth-dev] Wesnoth refactoring and future direction plan Ivan Illarionov
• 2009/01/04 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] Open lwetter to Ivan Illarionov Ivan Illarionov
• 2009/01/04 [Wesnoth-dev] Open lwetter to Ivan Illarionov Eric S. Raymond
• 2009/01/04 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] 1.7 design direction and the great Python shift David White
• 2009/01/04 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] Up and down arrow behaviour in MP dialog Mark de Wever
• 2009/01/04 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] 1.7 design direction and the great Python shift Jörg Hinrichs
• 2009/01/04 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] [Wesnoth-commits] r31950 - in /branches/1.4: changelog po/wesnoth-aoi/ja.po po/wesnoth-l/ja.po po/wesnoth-sof/ja.po po/wesnoth-utbs/ja.po Nils Kneuper
• 2009/01/04 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] 1.7 design direction and the great Python shift Mark de Wever
• 2009/01/04 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] 1.7 design direction and the great Python shift Ivan Illarionov
• 2009/01/04 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] 1.7 design direction and the great Python shift Jörg Hinrichs
• 2009/01/04 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] 1.7 design direction and the great Python shift Eric S. Raymond
• 2009/01/04 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] Up and down arrow behaviour in MP dialog jeremy rosen
• 2009/01/04 [Wesnoth-dev] Up and down arrow behaviour in MP dialog Mark de Wever
• 2009/01/04 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] 1.7 design direction and the great Python shift Sergey Popov
• 2009/01/03 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] 1.7 design direction and the great Python shift David White
• 2009/01/03 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] 1.7 design direction and the great Python shift Eric S. Raymond
• 2009/01/03 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] 1.7 design direction and the great Python shift Ignacio Morelle
• 2009/01/03 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] 1.7 design direction and the great Python shift Ivan Illarionov
• 2009/01/03 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] 1.7 design direction and the great Python shift David White
• 2009/01/03 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] 1.7 design direction and the great Python shift Ivan Illarionov
• 2009/01/03 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] 1.7 design direction and the great Python shift Ivan Illarionov
• 2009/01/03 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] 1.7 design direction and the great Python shift Martin Renold
• 2009/01/03 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] 1.7 design direction and the great Python shift allefant
• 2009/01/03 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] 1.7 design direction and the great Python shift Mark de Wever
• 2009/01/03 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] 1.7 design direction and the great Python shift Eric S. Raymond
• 2009/01/03 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] 1.7 design direction and the great Python shift Eric S. Raymond
• 2009/01/03 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] 1.7 design direction and the great Python shift jeremy rosen
• 2009/01/03 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] 1.7 design direction and the great Python shift Rusty Russell
• 2009/01/03 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] 1.7 design direction and the great Python shift Mark de Wever
• 2009/01/03 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] 1.7 design direction and the great Python shift Mark de Wever
• 2009/01/02 Re: [Wesnoth-dev] 1.7 design direction and the great Python shift David White

• Earlier messages
• Later messages