On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 23:40:08 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Thank you for your wonderful response and for forwarding it to the > wesnoth-dev list. I do want to say that I think you over estimate the number > of people who disable JS as a security risk. Using a couple snippets of > javascript does not mean you can't provide both sorting methods. It will be > completely transparent to users who disable JS, and those who enable it won't > even know its javascript. All in all it just makes for a better user > experience. What's secure enough for Google is good enough for me.
But that will encourage people to turn it on. I don't want to do that. It isn't the right place for that feature anyway. It should be done in the browser. (I do provide a way to request alternate sorts and you can bookmark the kind you like to avoid having to grab the page twice.) _______________________________________________ Wesnoth-dev mailing list Wesnoth-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev