Hi,

thanks Thonsew for this detailed explanation. My understanding ceased somewhere 
in C I guess.

as for A:
What you don't seem to know is that my interests (and that of many other wml 
authors as well I guess) in improving performance are completely different. 
Scenarios with "more than a few tens of enemy units" are very rare. Actually, I 
can hardly name anything else than Northern Rebirth and I never played that 
campaign since moving so many units on the human side is tiresome. Most wesnoth 
scenarios have a few ten units on the enemy sides, and many scenarios feature 
on RPG where we have very few units, or do change the game in a completely 
different way (see my MP addon SoW). All of these are affected (made unstable) 
by the config changes nevertheless. Also, have you activated animations, 
graphical effects and such, which take long during the ai turns anyway ?
What *IS* the bottleneck however is the wml loading phase - previously to 
tokens it was already always painful, now it's even more, like my primitive 
comparison shows. We wml and lua authors have a lot of interest in stable 
development versions however so that we can develop our addons while using new 
features as well. As you know now, fixing and testing is an extremely complex 
and time consuming task due to the lack of automated wml or lua tests. 
Experience shows that there isn't really much fixing during the "stabilizing" 
phases before the stable branches, so my strategy is to report as early as 
possible.

cheers,
Anonymissimus

cheers,
Anonymissimus

_______________________________________________
Wesnoth-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev

Reply via email to