-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi! Just to lease a short comment...
>> Would you like to have this in the main Wesnoth repo? >> > > on principle that sounds like a good idea, it's always good to have as much > code as possible in the main repo, however I can only speak in my name, and > Ivanovic is probably the one with the most visibility on packaging/ports > problems... Yes, I am in general very much in favor of having as much required for a specific port inside the main tree of Wesnoth as long as it does not result in additional clutter which is unmaintained. So as long as things required for a port are maintained I am perfectly fine with having them in mainline. But as Boucman already pointed out we are currently in feature freeze so I think adding your changes to mainline right now might be, uhm, problematic... I am not 100 sure how to best proceed here, comments and recommendations are welcome. Cheers, Nils Kneuper aka Ivanovic -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk7Ci0sACgkQfFda9thizwVohgCcC1c08DZHKHk9GroV5pU6dXZF LWoAmwX7TjhxxnMIz1dF7dODtW5AN1+z =VNAS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Wesnoth-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
