-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 18.11.2011 14:28, schrieb Derek: > If the rights they want are already granted to them by the GPL then do we > really have to "relicense"? The license we "grant" them would be the terms > of the GPL that we already grant everyone who downloads Wesnoth?
The problem is that they ask for a subset of the rights granted by the GPL including some "nothing else is granted" which is clearly wrong, since if it is GPL there are also parts that they would have to follow (making available sourcecode upon asking and whatnot). Yes, what they want is already a part of the GPL, but if it is still GPL then there is a whole lot of additional things that *they* would have to take into account which they try to stop with the agreement limiting things on one part aspect of the GPL which we IMO can not do without relicensing. Not 100% sure how stuff has to be read here, I just feel that it might be problematic/incorrect. Cheers, Nils Kneuper aka Ivanovic -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk7GYnQACgkQfFda9thizwWeHACfUvufBlAWfvW3N6RgVJkI5inX ZpUAniyfik8/fFrxuY663EQGDfxOq0vV =BtDK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Wesnoth-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
