> > The problem is that they ask for a subset of the rights granted by the GPL > including some "nothing else is granted" which is clearly wrong, since if it > is GPL there are also parts that they would have to follow (making available > sourcecode upon asking and whatnot). Yes, what they want is already a part of > the GPL, but if it is still GPL then there is a whole lot of additional things > that *they* would have to take into account which they try to stop with the > agreement limiting things on one part aspect of the GPL which we IMO can not > do without relicensing. > > Not 100% sure how stuff has to be read here, I just feel that it might be > problematic/incorrect. >
interesting take... my thought was "they don't modify the code, wesnoth provides the source, so no problem here" _______________________________________________ Wesnoth-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
