Hi, At the FOSDEM we discussed again about whether or not moving to git and thus from the location our source repository is hosted. The discussion is listed [1] under Git.
Personally I see not too much advantage by Git, git-svn works good enough for me. However IMO the uptime of GNA is getting lower over the years (it might be selective memory as well). So moving to another place to host our source repository might be a good idea. Am I the only one who thinks it would be a good idea to try to find a more reliable hosting party? Note moving to another hosting party does not mean switching to Git per se. How do we feel about moving to Git? As said I see not too much advantage by Git, but I'm not opposed to move. If so are there preferences over the hosting party? Rhonda also said she can probably host Git for us. If we decide to move, do we only want to move the source repository or also the bug-tracker and mailing lists? I haven't investigated whether or not it's possible to export our bug-tracker's contents. [1] http://wiki.wesnoth.org/FOSDEM2012#Mordante.27s_.60email.27 -- Regards, Mark de Wever aka Mordante/SkeletonCrew _______________________________________________ Wesnoth-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
