Ignacio Riquelme Morelle <[email protected]>:
> In the matter of CIA.vc hooks for Git, all those I have seen so far have 
> annoying limitations such as the inability to present real merges in a useful 
> fashion, commits being reported out of order, or no tag object reports. I 
> believe I have seen CIA reporting commits to hosted KDE projects addressing 
> some of these points, but I haven't found the hook's source yet.

Talk to me.  I maintain the CIA hooks that are in the git project
repo.  If you know of a more advanced version, I'm willing to merge
those features and changes.

> 3) The learning curve and organization. At the beginning (and even
> afterwards, as new people join the project) it will be very chaotic
> unless someone steps forward and provides users with links to
> documentation (since IME even code developers fail to RTFM at
> times), and most importantly, style guidelines covering commit
> style/format, usage of branches, real merges vs. rebasing, and so
> on.

I know how to handle this.  I've managed several large svn-to-git
transitions.
-- 
                <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
Wesnoth-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev

Reply via email to