"Dan Harkless" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If we had a wget.texi.in, we should be able to avoid that, doing the
> sample.wgetrc inclusion and "@" to "@@" mapping ourselves when
> creating wget.texi. Also, if we really wanted to, we could make
> wget.texi.in a developer-only file that doesn't get included in the
> distribution.
*shudder* I don't mind .in versions of simple files (or of Makefiles,
where it's already some sort of tradition), but I do mind
proliferation of .in files to the extent of having `wget.texi' being
auto-generated.
