Herold Heiko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> In the current cvs sources HAVE_RANDOM is mentioned in Changelog, used
> in a not exactly obvious way in main.c at line 577, but nowhere else.
> Is this a work in progress or a leftover of previous code ?
> Backup code for systems without 'random()' (hint hint VC++) is
> needed :)

The original patch used HAVE_RANDOM.  I didn't know there were system
Wget compiled on without random(), so I removed it.  I'll add a random
replacement, I guess.

Reply via email to