"Maciej W. Rozycki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: > >> I was also thinking about checking for `Wget' in the body, and things >> like that. > > That might be annoying (although it is certainly an option to consider > anyway) as someone sending a mail legitimately may assume the matter being > obvious from the list's name and definition and not repeat the program's > name anywhere in the headers or the body (only a version number for > example, or "current" when referring to a CVS snapshot). Just like I did > here. ;-)
Don't get me wrong, a "spam" detection wouldn't get discarded; it would simply need to be approved by an editor. So even the false positives would make to the list, only a tad later.
