"James C. McMaster (Jim)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This could be a great resource, but (I hate to say this) it has been > rendered more trouble than it is worth by the stubbornness and > stupidity of the owner. He has turned a deaf ear to all pleas to do > something, ANYTHING, to stop the flood of spam, viruses and > annoyances posted to the list.
Actually, I was planning to work on the spam problem this weekend. (Don't for a moment think I'm not annoyed by it.) It *will* be resolved, hopefully to everyone's satisfaction. But if several spams are enough to detract you from a "useful" resource and resort to name-calling targeted at the very person who created it, I cannot honestly feel dismayed by your choice. > This is the one and only mailing list that still maintains this > policy, This is a factually incorrect statement. > I will continue to use it without support, because getting support > is more trouble than it is worth. Don't forget that you can always post to the mailing list *without* being subscribed. :-) Who knows, maybe one day you'll reap the benefits of what you are badmouthing right now. I respectfully ask the other participants to extend their patience for some more days. I apologize for not having provided a better solution already. Despite the insults, I do not deny my part of the blame -- it is just your method (of dealing with spam) I disagree with.
