Well, I'll quote an age old standard... "better is always better".  Not to
sound sarcastic.  I have mine set at 1600x1200 on a 21inch monitor.  Makes
it much better to be able to see the maps.  This of course depends on the
size of the maps you are monitoring and the size of your network.  So the
short answer is yes, it does make a difference.

Patrick

>  -----Original Message-----
> From:         Chris Allen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 1:36 PM
> To:   '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject:      RE: [WhatsUp Forum] Whats the Best Platform for WhatsUp
> 
> So, does a better video card make that much difference? What about for the
> web viewing?
> 
>        -----Original Message-----
>       From:   "Webb, Patrick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@INTERNET@HHC  
>       Sent:   Tuesday, December 11, 2001 10:38 AM
>       To:     '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>       Subject:        RE: [WhatsUp Forum] Whats the Best Platform for
> WhatsUp
> 
>        << OLE Object: Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) >> 
>       I had a similar system, but found that reporting in WUG6.02 would
> about kill
>       the system.  I ordered a Dell 8200 with a P41.9, gig RAMBUS, 40gig
> HD and a
>       64meg video card for 1600x1200 viewing.  MUCH BETTER!
> 
>       Patrick Webb MCSE
>       Network Engineer
>       www.augustamed.com
> 
> 
> 
>       -----Original Message-----
>       From: Sawyer, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>       Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 10:22 AM
>       To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>       Subject: RE: [WhatsUp Forum] Whats the Best Platform for WhatsUp
> 
> 
>       I run it on a Dell OptiPlex GX110 (256MB, 800Mhz, W2K).
> 
>       V6.02 was very slow, but since I upgraded to version 7.0 it seems to
> have
>       speeded up quite a bit.
> 
>       It still takes a few seconds when I first start WUG, but when it's
> loaded
>       it's quite fast.
> 
>       HTH
> 
>       David Sawyer
> 
>       E-Mail - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>       Web - www.geocities.com/mrtg_daemon
> 
>       -----Original Message-----
>       From: John Warner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>       Sent: 11 December 2001 13:57
>       To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>       Subject: [WhatsUp Forum] Whats the Best Platform for WhatsUp
> 
> 
>       We run WhatsUp on a dual-200mhz NT4 system with 256 ram and it still
> takes
>       forever to bring up the various menu options or subnets. Should we
> be
>       running WhatsUp on a different OS or are there some performance tips
> that I
>       can tweak the system with?
> 
> 
>       Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
>       to be removed from this list.
> 
>       An Archive of this list is available at:
>       http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
> 
> 
>       
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
>       The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and is
> intended
>       only for the named recipient(s). If you are not the intended
> recipient you
>       must not copy, distribute, or take any action or reliance on it.
>       If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender.
>       Any unauthorised disclosure of the information contained in this
> e-mail
>       is strictly prohibited.
>       
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> 
> 
> 
>       Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
>       to be removed from this list.
> 
>       An Archive of this list is available at:
>       http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
> 
>       Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
>       to be removed from this list.
> 
>       An Archive of this list is available at:
>       http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
> 

Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html 
to be removed from this list.

An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/

Reply via email to