For what it's worth, they do appear to be generated by something on your network. This is the header of the read receipt in question:
 
Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0
Received: from neo2.nna.imrac.net ([10.1.20.54]) by neo1.nna.imrac.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 11 Dec 2003 11:46:00 -0600
X-Envelope-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thread-index: AcPADqPFG7/rUQZxTImDrqrKcaWSbA==
X-Envelope-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received: from mail2.nnacorp.com ([192.168.150.245]) by neo2.nna.imrac.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 11 Dec 2003 11:46:00 -0600
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
Importance: normal
Priority: normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Received: from list.ipswitch.com(156.21.1.21) by mail2.nnacorp.com via csmap  id e12ef642_2c01_11d8_8941_00304811e3c6_26146; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 11:46:00 -0600 (CST)
Received: from navsmtpgw.memhospcs.org [209.211.233.18] by list.ipswitch.com  (SMTPD32-8.04) id AD5354F03C2; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:45:55 -0500
Received: from NOTES01.memhospcs.org ([10.7.10.35]) by navsmtpgw.memhospcs.org (SAVSMTP 3.1.1.32) with SMTP id M2003121110452118215 for
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 11 Dec 2003 10:45:22 -0700
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [WhatsUp Forum] Using snmpnotify
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 10:38:33 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset="us-ascii"
Precedence: bulk
Sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-NAI-Spam-Score: 1.6
X-NAI-Spam-Level: *
X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggeredEXCUSE_3=1, NO_REAL_NAME=0.6
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Dec 2003 17:46:00.0602 (UTC) FILETIME=[A3C297A0:01C3C00E]
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 11:56 AM
Subject: Re: [WhatsUp Forum] Using snmpnotify


Hi Matthew,

My client is definintely not configured to send return receipts - I've inquired with my email admin about the situation and am waiting to hear back from him.   It doesn't make sense that the server would issue a return receipt for this ONE inbound mail traffic...but who the heck knows...I'll keep you posted.

Regards,




"Matthew Kitchin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

12/11/2003 10:50 AM

Please respond to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc
Subject
Re: [WhatsUp Forum] Using snmpnotify





I believe these are because Amir's email program or server is incorrectly
sending the read receipt to the forum instead of to Jason.

Jason - I imagine there are ways around this, if you wanted to do it. Is it
mandated at the server level ort mail client level?
I have the same issue at work, but I use a different mail client for all
forum type emails.

-Matthew

----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 11:38 AM
Subject: RE: [WhatsUp Forum] Using snmpnotify


>
> Return Receipt
>
>     Your document:        RE: [WhatsUp Forum] Using snmpnotify
>
>     was received by:      Amir Safayan/InfoSvcs/MEMHOSPCS
>
>     at:                   12/11/2003 10:43:59 AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> to be removed from this list.
>
> An Archive of this list is available at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
>


Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.

An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/

<<image/gif>>

Reply via email to