On 20/12/05, Lachlan Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I suspect that it would be based on IE5/Mac, just like MSN for Windows > is based on IE6/Win. It's simply a different UI with features designed > for MSN subscribers.
Yeah, it's based on Tasman. It's more improved over ie5m than ie6w was over ie5.0w though. Also it identifies itself as ie6... > > has no XML support (and thus no xml-stylesheet) but has XHTML > > support when sent as application/xhtml+xml support. > It's impossible for any browser to support XHTML if it doesn't support > XML, since XHTML is an application of XML. Therefore, your statement > doesn't make sense. I would argue that an XHTML engine may support just the XHTML DTDs with XML equivalent treatment without having a full XML engine. Though please don't ask me for a reason for going that way instead of having a full XML engine... My guess would be that the MSN/OSX browser just has an XHTML mode for the tag soup parser and throws the application/xhtml+xml content type to that. On 20/12/05, Anne van Kesteren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Or the implementation does not make sense ;-) True... -- David "liorean" Andersson <uri:http://liorean.web-graphics.com/>