On 12/20/05, Sander Tekelenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thus again it is an issue of Microsoft's relative monopoly in the browser > world. But I don't see many people arguing to declare CSS dead just because > IE's CSS support sucks. So why should we look that way at LINK?
It may just be me, but I perceive a great deal of difference between "IE supports CSS poorly" and "IE doesn't support CSS at all", only the latter of which seems relevant in the context of the `link` element. Aankhen
