At 10:33 +0530 UTC, on 2005/12/21, Aankhen wrote: > On 12/20/05, Sander Tekelenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Thus again it is an issue of Microsoft's relative monopoly in the browser >> world. But I don't see many people arguing to declare CSS dead just because >> IE's CSS support sucks. So why should we look that way at LINK? > > It may just be me, but I perceive a great deal of difference between > "IE supports CSS poorly" and "IE doesn't support CSS at all"
You're right. That wasn't a great comparison. -- Sander Tekelenburg, <http://www.euronet.nl/~tekelenb/>
