Quoting Henri Sivonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
The test case is wrong according to the current working draft,
because the value of repeat-max is '0' in the test case and only
positive integers are allowed values (and other values are ignored).
Why is 0 not a positive integer?
Because zero is neither positive nor negative.
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Zero.html
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PositiveInteger.html
Don't you have positive and negative 0's?
Only in floating point values as a technical detail--not in pure math
or in two's complement digital integers.
Fair enough.
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
