On Tue, 14 Nov 2006, Simon Pieters wrote: > > I was thinking about making omitted ="" for all attributes conforming. > I'm not sure it's a good idea, but might be worth considering.
It already is. <a b> equivalent to <a b="">. (Unless I made a mistake somewhere, which is quite possible.) > * Less obvious which attributes are boolean attributes and which are > not by looking at the source. It's already pretty hard to tell anyway. (I haven't defined that part of the spec yet though.) -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
