On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:34:05 +0600, Michel Fortin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<figure> cannot be used like this:
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Painting</th>
<th>Title</th>
<th>Author</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><img id="img1" src="..."></td>
<td><label for="img1" type="title">Mona Lisa</label></td>
<td>Leonardo da Vinci</td>
</tr>
...
</tbody>
</table>
Hum, now that I see your example again, I understand that I haven't
adressed at all what you meant.
Well, indeed that's a limitation of <figure>: it can't span across
different table cells. But on the other side, I don't think I'd call
"Mona Lisa" a caption in your example. It's certainly a title however,
I'm not saying it's a caption either. A caption is just one of the
possible ways of rendering a title.
and I think the table makes the association pretty clear by itself.
It's not clear for Google Images which needs to extract (image, title)
pairs from documents.
--
Alexey Feldgendler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[ICQ: 115226275] http://feldgendler.livejournal.com
