* Ian Hickson wrote: >> You should request removal of the section. It is just a non-normative >> discussion of implications of the parsing algorithm despite the claim >> that "extra restrictions" are being defined and the misuse of RFC2119 >> keywords. As the thread shows, such discussion is unlikely to be com- >> plete, but likely to mislead and confuse. > >Actually, it's the only place that defines what the syntax is. It's >rather important! The parser section defines how to parse and report >errors, but it doesn't give conformance criteria for documents and >authoring tools.
That may be so. I am saying is it is a very bad idea to organize the specification this way. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
