On Apr 7, 2007, at 3:16 PM, Nicholas Shanks wrote:
On 7 Apr 2007, at 15:47, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Sat, 07 Apr 2007 14:27:14 +0200, Nicholas Shanks
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
AFAIK browsers and other HTML clients don't currently treat these as
comments, [...]
Well, sorry to say, you got your facts wrong.
*sigh*
I guess that means we're already down the hole. Can we at least
stop digging?
Even you must (begrudgingly?) admit that "comments" formatted as in
your original post are not backwards compatible, even if they do
reflect the state of modern UAs as you say.
Not backwards compatible with what? The whole reason for Anne's
proposed rules is backwards compatibility.
Regards,
Maciej
